Anyone who disagrees with you can have force initiated against them for trying to leave without permission?
Violence isn't an argument. Morality isn't subjective. We've already covered this on other posts.
This is why you shouldn't bother with other people's morality whether they are stoning people in the street, burning women along their husbands (india), drowing young girls (china), executing people (usa), etc etc.
Are you really suggesting that these things are moral from a certain perspective? I wouldn't bother with their "morality" because these things are immoral.
If your way of life is more efficient in liberland then more people will join constituting USA or any other "social contract" nation obsolete.
I'm not sure why I would need to subject myself to the initiation of force in order to not have force initiated against me.
Again, appeal to the cudgel isn't an argument, sophist.
RE: Social Contracts and Sacred Rituals