No, im saying that whether or not the law applies to a specific circumstance or person can only be established with legal argumentation. Not with evidence. You might not think this is the way it ought to work, but this is the way it does, in fact, work. That's why judges, not juries, decide issues of jurisdiction.
Really?
http://marcstevens.net/articles/debunking-territorialpersonal-jurisdiction-doesnt-exist.html
RE: Dirty Prosecution Tactic - Flipping the Burden of Proof