Excellent. I'm curious what drives you to pursue these frontal assaults in the courts. It's excellent work, sometimes the arguments work but most of the time they don't, no matter how sound the logic and well presented it is.
In one respect it's testimony of the power of perseverance. On the other hand the game is rigged so why continue to play?
It takes a lot of skill to litigate and keep one's composure. I am glad there are people like you who have such skill for those who find themselves in situations where they have no choice but to either pursue a defense or give up. You serve as a prime example of how to mount a defense in a logical manor, and also are up front in telling people about the risks involved.
We met in Austin TX well over 10 years ago, I don't recall the exact venue or seminar. It was a year or 2 after you published the first edition of Adventures in Legal Land, and I enjoyed watching you explain some of it's concepts to people who were skeptics or just couldn't get past their cognitive dissonance.
Glad to see you here on Steemit, I'm resteeming this article for wider visibility.
RE: Motion Granted Again-Dismissal with Prejudice After Sham Trial