Deny that networks and the concepts necessary to access them exist all you like, they will not go away. At the end of the day, most people reject anarchy, even those who would respect individual rights in a way that would give anarchists 99% of what they claim to want. That anarchists can't see this, what Thoreau saw so clearly, emboldens and empowers the state. In effect, the existing state has bent all anarchists to its will by weeding out the few who had an intelligent approach, and leaving the idiots behind to seed the network with isolationism and non-participation "political relinquishment" memes.
I worked for the Libertarian Party until I realized they were VERY SUCCESSFULLY infiltrated by the FBI. In fact, the single person making every important decision in the LP is an FBI agent, or GOP agent, or central bank agent, or compromised. ...Whatever. It doesn't matter who he's working for: It matters what he does.
...And the things he does cannot result in individual freedom. In fact, they appear to be carefully calculated to make certain individual freedom does not accidentally arise from the party's ballot access activism structure.
This is also true of the anarchist armies on the internet who counsel a form of "technological relinquishment" known correctly as "political relinquishment" but which they claim is "principled non-voting." (...Very ironically, since many claim to be Agorists, and agorists themselves supposedly favor pursuing freedom directly by technological means. They don't realize that stupid, unphilosophical nodes in a network are governed by network laws, not the laws that govern "individualists." Moreover, they fail to recognize that electoral systems, civics classes, and knowledge of proper jury structure are all forms of cybernetic technology themselves.)
For more on these ideas, I strongly recommend Kevin Kelly's book "Out of Control" and Norbert Wiener's "The Human Use of Human Beings."
RE: End The Hyphenate War: A Clarification Of Rights & Reality