I don't know your particular case, obviously, but especially if you have no criminal record were accused of a non-violent offense, this isnt uncommon. Its the way the legal system works. The DA overcharges, then offers a deal (im not saying this is good, just the way things are). It has nothing to do with the court recognizing some sort of loop hole that says you don't have to follow the law if you don't want to. As a matter of fact, if you started spouting that nonsense to the DA, you probably ended up getting a worse deal than you would have otherwise.
Most of these "success stories" seem to be someone getting charged with a minor crime, the citing officer or primary witness either not showing up at the hearing or deciding not to tesitfy . If it was based on a ruling that the court had no jurisdiction, there would be a written judgement stating that explicitly, not a dismissal due to lack of evidence. One wouldnt have to infer it.
Thats why so many of his "successes" are summary offenses like tickets. In most jurisdictions ,tickets get dismissed about half the time you take them to court anyway (because the guy who wrote it doesnt show up). So every time that happens, he sees a dismissal and interprets it as backing up his wackadoo theories.
Also, i should point out that this "shill" , in about a y ear and a half of criminal practice, kept more people out of jail than you and marc stevens put together. So there's that. As someone who has actually been in court, and actually argued cases and negotiated plea agreements, i can tell you with zero hesitation that taking the position you are talking about is going to hurt your prospects. A lot.
RE: Ginger gets ticket dismissed in Texas!