When the machine dominates, technology applies in the form of a working machine, a judging machine, a checking machine and the machine is also blamed. The general description, even though it is clear that its presence is made by advances according to the era's technology. And its development is made according to the needs of the times. But in the end it was used no longer in accordance with the needs of the times but to be misinterpreted and debated.
Humans as part of life in reality can only argue and find fault. Examinations and actual scores of gaps and differences are preferred. That is why humans in the end can only judge rather than create. The percentage of creators in the form of progress will always be inversely proportional to those who only use it. And after being created, it seems that the main problem is the negative side compared to the positive created.
Artificial Intelligence is a guide for convenience and learning that makes it easier for the policy processing system of everything humans present or create something. Reducing error conditions in all stages that humans have as a context lacks the problem of forgetting. However, differences in goals and bridges of use in the end create a space full of helplessness for creators who may indeed not be noticed or indeed ultimately eliminated. In the end artificial intelligence is misused based on its actual use.
Which of the pictures above are not the result of artificial intelligence and which are not according to the rules.
There is a general systematic, society is formed in an established context that places anyone in a better place than the insecure. So that people are used to seeing the context of good words from a financial perspective, no longer a matter of etymology and truth.
Your money will be better here, like how hive (platform) works out of context as hive (natural honey bees) works, this is just an example not to judge the systematics of how a platform works. However, for obvious reasons, this is how the reality of the platform's working system was formed. Relevant or not please judge yourself.
There is a lot of writing that is honest, kind, and clear, but unfortunately, writing in the standard context actually gets a more irrational place. There are many creations that are indeed useful for the needs of people's lives, but in reality they are silenced/removed because they can harm people who are comfortable when these creations have not been created.
So basically the assessment of a basic criticism that is irrelevant is the same as a bad assessment of human attitudes towards life. Usefulness is misunderstood and misery becomes the scapegoat for those who habitually blame. The criticism built into the contents of this writing can still be detrimental to one party, and the consequences will certainly be obtained and may have consequences. That's why the current form of society works and evaluates the reality that has indeed been formed in such and such circumstances and conditions.
Welcome to the critical modelization of models in the world robotics era.
-===-
The correct answer to the question which is not made by artificial intelligence is that everything is made by artificial intelligence, originality is only an auxiliary word for writing.