It’s interesting that your criticism comes with such untidy and vague feedback. Maybe a little more clarity on what you're actually objecting to would be helpful? You’re asking for original content, yet it seems you're criticizing necessary information that was relevant and integral to the article itself. It’s not just about "creating content" — it's about providing the full picture and making sure important facts are included.
If you're truly concerned about content quality, perhaps a little help on how to properly give constructive feedback would be useful too, especially when criticizing something you seem to not fully understand. But hey, we all could use a little help now and then, right?
RE: BEOS Cross-Chain Network: A Sleeping Giant Awaiting Revival?