The coin was located around the margin of the financial markets for less than a decade, but now it is becoming more and more important to be an alternative asset class. Can the Government of any major state step up and do what cannot be imagined — a ban on the pygmies?
Back to the past – owning gold bullion is a crime
Those who believe that no government (except those run by bad dictators) can take an extreme step such as banning the coin-forming, they really need to return to the old history and receive lessons from it. For some time, the possession of gold bullion in the United States of America was an offence punishable by up to 10 years ' imprisonment. In 1933, US President Franklin D. Roosevelt ordered all Americans to hand over their gold possessions to the Federal Reserve Bank. The ban on owning gold has been in place for more than four decades, before President Ford has approved the legitimacy of gold ownership. This change was easy when considering the fact that America had abandoned the standard of gold for a short period during the presidency, and therefore there was no need to have huge amounts of gold to support the currency being printed.
The Great Firewall that China has imposed
Another frequent argument against the ban on the pygmies is that in the age of the globalized internet economy, individual governments lacked the power and authority to act against the decentralized currency such as biformation. But despite that, all we have to do is just look at how China is restricting the use of the Internet, to realize that the situation is not what we think. Through a combination of government legislation and blocking of popular foreign websites by Chinese internet service providers, I tried the Chinese government is restricting the use of the Internet by citizens, rather than enabling them to access the Internet worldwide. The government has used movement control tools to stifle political dissent. So it would not be a step towards banning bigenesis a very big leap for the Chinese government.
India and the money replacement process
If you think the paper coins that are printed by the government and are validated by the central bank, will be the last thing to be blocked, so reconsider again! The Indian government issued a decree in November November of 2016, stating that the category of papers would cease to give legal tender almost immediately. The Indian citizens had to line up in the banks to deposit their old currency papers. Where the currency replacement was not easy, which led to the lining of huge lines versus ATMs. The replacement of the currency was also justified as a means of reducing income tax evasion and resolving most of the government's problems. Almost a year later, it became clear that the currency replacement process had failed to meet the government's objectives and had only increased demand for the building.
Unavoidable issues.
If the government decides to consider the handling or possession of a currency as illegal, questions will be raised about how to enforce the prohibition exactly. It is impossible for the government to take possession of its own coin, unless you decide to hand over the keys to your own portfolios. However, the majority of citizens and institutions wish to remain on the right side of the law. Therefore, the demand for the bigenesis will be reduced if the government decides to ban it. All the exchange platforms in that country will also be closed, and the purchase and sale of the biformation will be difficult and risky. This would strangle the pygmies in that country and thus the Government would be able to achieve its objectives.