So why does it say that article is by 'danielle'? I am just curious. If you post something on Hive that has been posted elsewhere then you need to be able to prove it is your own work or we have to assume it is plagiarised. The onus is on you to provide the proof. Is this you on Twitter? With so few followers it is not proving much.
A lot of people do an introductory post that can include photograhic or video proof of who is using the account. A link from another site to Hive is further evidence. If someone was pretending to you then you would not want them to be earning from it.
I do not want to drive people away from Hive, but we have to be vigilant about abuse.
RE: Proof of work Vs Proof of stake