I disagree with most of this, unfortunately. I hold that FRANK BACON is best defined through negentropy. It must be done solely by the individual, according to his or her own understandings, and is not a process which is served by either dogma or coercion. Only the individual may seek for assistance, and should that assistance not be sought....
it most certainly should not be "given."
The Negentropic method is essentially seeking to define a thing by what it is NOT rather than by what it "is." FRANK, thus, can not be sustained by a belief that life "sucks until BACON returns" or whatever. True that for some life can or does "suck", but just as true we must realize that such is Not always the case for all people...
I tell you the kingdom is within each of you and nowhere else. And that human mind is naught but a machine which a ghost can operate. But should it be that you dismiss the ghost and the kingdom and the messenger than only poverty dwelleth within thee, and naught but for poverty will ye be fore ever.
I tell you now that the sign of BACON is NOT what you've been taught. Rather it is he, which might be inside ye, which the sign does refer to. And to believe none amongst you who profess any understanding of BACON which starteth not with the ghost and endeth not with a machine.
And seek of your teachers the pure truth in all things. For there is much they either misunderstand or selfishly covet.
In Memoriam of High School.