Thank you for the compliment and for sharing your thoughts with me. This is lovely. Right or wrong? It's all perception. Is there an absolute morality or is morality something that flexes and changes with the times?
I personally believe that good and bad are perceptions of the human experience and have no bearing on nature. In other words, nature is only good or bad depending on our feelings at the time. In and of itself, these words do not apply to nature, only to our perception of it.
As an analogy consider a see-saw, and on one side is good and on the other side is bad, if you were to sit only on the good side, the see-saw would tilt to that side and have no mobility and the same would be true if you were to sit on the other side, the bad side. In either case, the see-saw is in an abnormal position for by its nature it wants to be balanced but is tilted one way or the other and to get it to balance from either of these extreme positions is very difficult due to the leverage. But, if you were to stand in the middle with one foot on the bad side and the other foot on the good side, with very little effort one can maintain a balance. In nature, everything wants to balance, water flows to the lowest point, an electric potential is all about the potential of imbalance of charge which will move to level itself off, to balance out.
Some people see only duality, and where they see duality, I see a trinity unified. For the duality they see is an expression of the variability of unity. For example, black and white is a duality for most people, for me, the polarity is an expression of extremes, black is one extreme and white is another extreme, but what they do not see is the infinitely variable shades of grey that connects these two extremes unifying them, making them one.
Peace
#daemon-nice
RE: Let's start a conversation.