Oooh, okay. I get it now. When I googled the phrase with communism at the end I got way more information. 'Collectivizing' a toothbrush as means of production or public property is pretty wild. I've met some far-out hippie commune goers while living in Berkeley, but never that nutty. And while they usually share food and living quarters and stuff like that, everyone had usually either paid for, worked to procure, put in time for, or otherwise earned that food and space. It's funny cuz during my search, on Reddit I saw a post using Uber as an example of your personal possessions (le' car) being claimed a means for production in the name of capitalism. I worked as a driver myself for a bit and the wear and tear on my car along with the cost of gas ended up far outweighing any money I made working. Thanks for getting back to me on this btw. :)
RE: When "Anarcho" "capitalists" show up to a reasonable discussion about socioeconomics.