DiscoverWavesDecks

@double-negative: I first saw the

RE: RE: Mate in 3 [KRBP vs kqr] Explained (CGCP 00238)

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Mate in 3 [KRBP vs kqr] Explained (CGCP 00238)

View the full context

RE: Mate in 3 [KRBP vs kqr] Explained (CGCP 00238)

double-negative(52)

Published in

Words

0

Reading

0 min

Listen

Play

Monday, September 24, 2018 12:28 AM

I first saw the Rxc5+ variation, which your analysis says is a mate in 5. Nice puzzle!

Monday, September 24, 2018 12:28 AM

double-negative(52)

This post was published via dtube. Ecency is not the originator or editor of this content and displays it for discovery purposes only.

$ 0.000

1