I got up this morning and found that I had a new comment on the cn-voice post yesterday. The ID is @Steemclearners. I am very curious. Why does this seemingly alert ID come to comment? Later, I found out that it may be because I didn't indicate the source of the lyrics, and maybe the source of the image. I don't know the exact reasons.
今天早上起来发现，我昨天参加cn-voice的帖子有一个新的评论来自ID为@Steemclearners，我很好奇，这个看起来很警示性的ID为什么会来评论？后来发现，可能因为我没有注明歌词来源，可能还有图片的来源，具体如何我不清楚。
First of all, I apologize for not indicating a reference to the source, I am sorry here.
首先，我承认我没有做好来源的引用行为，在这里我表示抱歉。
Secondly, I am also confused.
其次，我也很困惑。
As an one-month-long new comer, this is my third time to participate in the cn-voice activity. In the first two times, I had unmarked quoted lyrics, but there was no problem, but this time I was suddenly told that I had violated the rules.
作为刚满月的新人，这是我第3次参加cn-voice的活动，在前2次中我都有未注明的引用歌词，但也都没有发生问题，可是这一次却突然被cue到说我犯规。
Mmm...... I don't know what to say.
这……不知道该怎么说。
Finally, I would like to talk about a few opinions and suggestions from the position of a steepmit user, because I feel that orderly and stable execution rules can help the steemians who do not understand the rules to gradually follow the rules and build the community together.
最后，我想从一个steemit用户的立场，谈几点看法与建议，因为我觉得有序、稳定的执行规则，可以帮助不了解规则的steemians逐步更好的遵守规则，共同建设社区。
1.To add hints before Posting
Steemit claimed that each act was recorded, and all of them make costs.
So, why not tick some key points in the "click to post" place?
1.建议在发帖前增加提示
Steemit宣称各个行为都被记录，包括修改，因为有成本。
那么，为什么不在"点击发帖”的地方，对一些关键点进行提示打勾？
Eg:
Please confirm whether there is a textual error.
Please confirm whether it is quoted or not.
请确认是否有错别字？
请确认是否引用?
I don't know if it adds to the cost, but it's a necessary reminder of good behavior, especially for newcomers.
我不清楚这样是不是会增加成本，但对一个好行为的养成，这样的提醒是必要的，对于新人来说，更是如此。
2.Encourage friendly reminders, report the next.
I might have been reported.
The reporter's reward of 0.5SP is certainly good, but it is somewhat offensive from the perspective of humanity.
Because we are in a community that encourages communication, not in the courtroom.
2.鼓励友善提醒，举报次之
我可能是被举报的。
举报者奖励0.5SP固然不错，然而从人性化的角度来看有些令人反感。因为我们所在的是一个鼓励交流的社群，并不是在法庭面对执法人员。
Rules are designed to make people better, right?
建立规则的初衷，是用来是大家变得更好，不是吗？
I'd like to make a suggestion and draw a flow chart for your reference.
我想提个建议，画了个流程图，请参考
【Flow chart description】
【流程图说明】
Steemian found a problem with the post,
Steemian发现帖子有问题留言提醒，
Situation a:
If the author finds that there is indeed a problem, modify it and pay a certain amount of thank-you fee to the discoverer. If not pay the fee, report it.
情况a：
如果作者发现确实有问题，修改并支付一定的感谢费给发现者，若没有支付则进行举报。
Situation b:
If the author did not explain or modify for days, report it.
情况b：
如果作者并没有解释也不修改，启动举报。
Situation c:
If the author explains it clearly, no problem, no need to modify. Since it is a kind of reminder, just make a friend.
情况c：
如果作者解释清楚说没问题，不需要修改。既然是善意的提醒，那大家说清楚，交个朋友就好了。
Wouldn't it be better to encourage acts of kindness?
鼓励善意提醒的行为不是更好吗？
3.About the name "Steemcleaners"
3.关于称呼“Steemcleaners”
The Bible says we are all guilty. So in the church we see the pastor and pray or repent. Why isn't it called the humancleaners? If he calls that name, do you think anyone else will go?
圣经上说，人都是有罪的。所以在教堂里我们看见牧师pastor（可能还要换一个词），向他祷告或忏悔。那它为什么不叫humancleaners？如果他叫了这个名字，还有人去吗？
If Steemit's rule is that the first warning is a friendly reminder, please consider the above process and change the name.
如果Steemit的规则是第一次发现是警告，是一种善意的提醒的话，那么，是否可以考虑上面流程，并且换个名字呢？
Thank you！
以上，谢谢！