I think I see what you're saying here.
I can buy that the 'official story' is just a lie, given of the propensity for lying that people have. In fact that longer paper I shared gives something of a quantitative measure of how effectively people lie with the p parameter of the equation.
Though it could also be mere ignorance about the effects of a new technology, or how those effects differ from the theoretical model's predictions.
There are always unknown unknowns. Perhaps even more than there are malicious thoughts, given the vast scale of the universe and it's impregnable mystery.
RE: Atomic bombs are a complete con job – they don’t even exist