Kleros connects users and helps those who need to resolve disputes with juries who have the ability to solve problems fairly and transparently. In addition to these, it has a resolution capacity that uses technology through block chains and shared resources juries to resolve disputes in an immediate, secure and accessible manner.
The main objective of Kleros is to provide people with their help when they can not be resolved by the state courts, which offers their arbitration of fast access and in a secure manner regarding the disputes that may arise.
How can this benefit small businesses?
Some small companies for not being recognized may not give their legal problems much importance or simply do not take them seriously, let's say a situation: a small company hires someone to do a remodeling in their business and this person does not comply With what was promised and in the stipulated time, Kleros takes this case with his system of intelligent contracts, only one part is given to the worker who did not complete his work, which was his advance payment, Kleros saves the rest, seeing the breach of the contract both parties, the contractor and the contracted must pay a certain commission for the trial that will be carried out with specialists, at the end, the winner of the trial will take the rest of the money and the judges will have the commission that both paid, Kleros helps everyone who needs help.
How can Kleros benefit large corporations that handle many disputes?
Kleros having several people working for him, can manage several simultaneous disputes, say as an example eBay, eBay has a problem with a client and hire Kleros for the resolution of disputes, but another problem appears with another client, without any problem Can Kleros take care of that, has several specialists to control the problem and does not get out of hand.
Problem solving system:
into account that this is just a small example.
Problem solving system:
The system of Kleros to solve people's problems is based on 3 simple steps:
An intelligent contract is created, choosing Kleros as its adjudication protocol.
Information regarding the debate is sent securely to Kleros.
Selection of the jury, who evaluate and issue the possible options to choose.
A decision is applied through the intelligent contract.
Once this is done, you will only have to wait for a dispute to arise so that you can immediately seek the help of Kleros and be able to solve the problem that may arise.
The arbitrary experts of Kleros will propose and grant the best options to choose for the debate, but only the referee will get credit for a dispute if his proposed opinion is chosen. That is, if the option of arbitrary A obtains more votes, the arbitrary B and C will be qualified their options as incoherent, judge A will receive his pay and a good grade, but judges B and C will lose reputation. Kleros guarantees us the best options and the best arbitrary ones because if B and C have a high number of incoherent votes, they will lose tokens and consider themselves as a deficient judge.
Others say they can resolve my disputes, what guarantee do I have that Kleros works?
Well I explain my dearest friend, currently there are many pages and platforms that promise to resolve a debate easily and quickly, but the reality is that they are services in which the person who helps resolve the dispute is usually a single person in addition to have no experience whatsoever, which could cause terrible results in an instant, like putting your safety at risk first, worsening the issue or simply proposing an agreement which would only be detrimental to the debaters, it would be harmful to make a bad decision in a small business that is beginning to grow.
Kleros guarantees you the help of not one but several people who have and cover great experience depending on the area in which you work, Kleros connects the debaters with the arbitrary jury so that everyone can have a conversation together and reach the best possible agreement. In addition, going to a court would cost us a lot of money out of pocket, something that would also put a company that is just beginning with a bad position, with Kleros the service commissions are much more low that in a court, say about $150 instead of $9,000 which would be very beneficial for the user taking into account that this is just a small example.
What are some good use cases?
It would be easier to say what are some bad use cases, NONE, Kleros has a fairly fair system, and do not believe that the judges always win, suppose that there are 5 judges in the debate, and this option A and option B, 4 of them chose option A and only one of them chose option B, because it is not coherent and the only one to choose a bad decision, you will be desecrited money from the profits, so you have to make a wise decision about the problems
Images taken from Kleros
Team
kleros2018