Part 4 - Big Pharma
of the EXPOSÉ: BillGates-COVID-19-ID2020-WHO-CDC-BigPharma-Gavi-Rockefeller: Connecting the Dots
Introduction to this Exposé
Hello everyone,
This is a continuation of my exposé. In PART 1 - Bill Gates + Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation we saw how Bill Gates is not only a highly corrupt and evil individual thrusting his might to vaccinate every man, woman, and child on this planet, but also how he uses his billions and power and influence across a wide spectrum of alliances in order to push a greater agenda on the masses. In PART 2 - The CDC (Center for Disease Control) & PART 3 - The WHO (World Health Organization) we saw much of the same nefariousness.
In this part, we explore the unimaginable level of power and influence Big Pharma holds over governments, doctors, health care practitioners, academics, medical literature, along with the size, scope, profitability of their business model and how they forego safety and basic concern for human life in the process.
And a the end of the exposé, I will connect the major dots from each and show you how they all tie into each other for the Greater Plan they have in store for us.
Note that this exposé is divided into the following parts:
PART 1 - Bill Gates + Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
PART 2 - The CDC (Center for Disease Control)
PART 3 - The WHO (World Health Organization)
PART 4 - BIG PHARMA (this post)
PART 5 - The Gavi Alliance
PART 6 - The Rockefellers & The Rockefeller Foundation
PART 7 - ID2020 under COVID-19
Conclusion & Call To Action
PART 4 - BIG PHARMA
The Size & Scope of Big Pharma (a very brief backgrounder)
The pharmaceutical industry, responsible for the development, production and marketing of medications, is absolutely colossal. Just to give one figure that encompasses the scope of this industry reads as follows:
Source: Statista.com - Global Pharmaceutical Industry - Statistics & Facts
That's US$1.2 trillion of revenue (worldwide) for the year 2018 alone.
Here is a breakdown of the largest pharmaceutical companies in terms of their Prescription Sales and R & D Spending (for the year 2018):
Source: Statista.com - Top 50 global pharmaceutical companies by prescription sales and R&D spending in 2018
Once again, the numbers are staggering, with a range of US$17 - $45 billion (per annum) among the top 16.
With that kind of financial clout, the industry, as a collective, not only generates a ridiculous amount of profits for its various stakeholders and shareholders, but also holds a tremendous amount of power and influence over government, academia, as well as medical organizations and associations.
To give the reader an example of the enormity of the industry's influence, one need look no further than the millions of dollars it spends each and every year on lobbying efforts.
For the United States, the Big Pharma lobby spends more than any other group, including oil & energy. As of 2018, according to Investopedia.com the industry spent $3.9 billion over the past 20 years, the pharmaceutical and health products industry has far outpaced all other industries in lobbying spending. Moreover, according to Statista, they were the clear winners of the lobbying pack with a whopping $295 million for 2019 in 2019 - dwarfing the second place holder. (Sources: 1,2, 3, 4, 5)
Source: Statista.com - Leading lobbying industries in the United States in 2019, by total lobbying spending
Power & Influence of Big Pharma
The power and influence of Big Pharma is not limited to lobbying efforts in the congressional halls and five-start dining tables of Washington, D.C; but, rather, are systemic across the United States and in other countries around the world. And, frankly speaking, this is of grave concern given the nefarious practices that has been synonymous with the industry over the past several decades, particularly with regards to the Vaccine Industry.
Accordingly, and, without flooding the reader's mind with an inexhaustible list of industry misdoings, I will merely provide a selective and demonstrative overview of the nature of who we are really dealing with. This, in the context of reviewing the industry's credibility and track record with regards to develop vaccines and related medicines in the wake of the Covid-19 Pandemic that is sweeping across the globe - the consequences of which may prove calamitous for humanity.
So, here we go.
I think it best to begin my focus on an area in which the pharmaceutical industry has a tremendous amount of influence and does so in a stealthily and deceptive manner. Namely, I'm talking about how it employs countless tactics that subvert the very nature of the thoughtful practice of medicine by practitioners in the field of medicine and health care.
Ghostwriting
More specifically, I am referring to how individuals employed by the pharmaceutical companies and their respective associations design and write journal articles which are then "rubber stamped" and signed by highly reputable doctors and then published in the top medical journals which are then reviewed and taken for gospel by countless physicians across the health care sector.
If you think this practice sounds crazy, then keep reading. Firstly, on a personal note, my father was a Microbiologist and specialized in infectious diseases and had, on numerous occasions, told me about how this practice was pervasive systemic across the health care sector. Moreover, he also told me how common it was for pharmaceutical companies, through their representatives and sales people, to allot nice financial bonuses for doctors who participated in such unethical, immoral, and highly questionable deeds. Needless, to say I had always found these practices to be utterly disgusting and repulsive.
While I am not saying that this practice occurs in all instances, let's nonetheless look at some of the literature with regards to this practice.
Writing medical articles by pharmaceutical industry members is a practice known as ghostwriting. Here is a quick definition of the term and practice:
Ghostwriting is one primary method the pharmaceutical industry uses to manipulate the evidence base. This tactic involves misleading the scientific community and the public about who conducted a study. (Source: 1)
The description above comes from an article entitled The Pharmaceutical Industry and the Corruption of the Medical Evidence Base from Medicating Normal - a documentary that exposes such misdoings in the industry. They continue:
In this practice, employees of the pharmaceutical company are tasked with designing a study that will find a positive effect for their drug—a process which can involve several unethical or controversial research methods—and then writing a paper that spins any negative results into a positive finding.
Finally, influential academic psychiatrists but who had nothing to do with the study are asked to put their name on it – as if they had conducted and written it themselves. In some cases, they are not even allowed to see the actual data, even if they ask for it. The study is then submitted to medical journals with the name of the prominent psychiatrist as the authors.
They also note the following troubling characteristics of the practice:
A further problem is that the medical journals, and the peer review process, which are supposed to be the gatekeepers of science, also have serious conflicts of interest. Many of the doctors and researchers who do the peer review are also paid consultants of pharmaceutical companies.
The former editor of the top-tier medical journal, New England Journal of Medicine, Marcia Angell, has written a book and many editorials about this problem. The former editor of the prestigious British Medical Journal has also spoken out about medical journals cannot be honest gatekeepers.
In addition, here is but one way in which clinical trials can be biased by design and otherwise be used to provide unreliable information:
Publication bias is another problem that distorts the medical evidence base. Pharmaceutical companies finance most medical research but when the researchers find negative results, they simply don’t publish them. For instance, a company will finance ten studies of an antipsychotic drug, with slightly different trial designs. Let’s say seven of them find no effect of the drug, but three of them find a small positive effect. You simply send only the three positive studies to scientific journals for publication. The other seven studies just disappear. Doctors only read the three positive studies, and they believe the evidence is unanimously in favor of the drug!
As you can see by the Publication bias method alone, doctors get duped and deceived when they fail to realize that there can be a larger number of studies (unbeknownst to them) that actually reveal adverse effects to the given drug (or treatment) that they prescribe to their patients.
This is practice further corroborated by none other than the British Medical Journal as stated in their (03 October 2018) research study entitled Collaboration between academics and industry in clinical trials: cross sectional study of publications and survey of lead academic authors. Here are some troubling highlights from this article beginning with the Abstract section [Emphasis added in some instances]:
Objectives: To determine the role of academic authors, funders, and contract research organisations in industry funded trials of vaccines, drugs, and devices and to determine lead academic authors’ experiences with industry funder collaborations.
Design: Cross sectional analysis of trial publications and survey of lead academic authors.
Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: The most recent 200 phase III and IV trials of vaccines, drugs, and devices with full industry funding, at least one academic author, published in one of the top seven high impact general medical journals (New England Journal of Medicine, Lancet, JAMA, BMJ, Annals of Internal Medicine, JAMA Internal Medicine, and PLoS Medicine).
Results: Employees of industry funders co-authored 173 (87%) of publications; 183 (92%) trials reported involvement of funders in design, and 167 (84%) reported involvement of academic authors....The corresponding author was an academic author in 192 (96%) trials. The lead academic author had conflicts of interest with the trial funder in 165 (83%) trials.
Conclusions: Industry employees and academic authors are involved in the design, conduct, and reporting of most industry funded trials in high impact journals.
To summarize: the BMJ study examined 200 cases of Phase 3 & 4 trials (those include humans as subjects) from 2017 backwards (in time) and found that more than 80% of the time pharmaceutical companies (and other funders) were involved in the design and writing of the trial publications which found their way in the top seven medical journals.
Such numbers are quite astounding and worrisome to say the least, as they give an indication to the scale and scope of this practice that takes place between academics and the pharmaceutical industry.
More literature exist on the subject, but I will only emphasize one more, as it gives a specific example with Merck - a leading big pharma firm from the U.S. A 2007 study entitled Ghost Management: How Much of the Medical Literature Is Shaped Behind the Scenes by the Pharmaceutical Industry? which was funded by the Humanities Research Council of Canada sheds more light on the issue.
They begin with an example of how Merck employed this practice with their trial of a drug called Vioxx. Here is the related extract [Emphasis added]:
For example, as reported in The New York Times, an Annals of Internal Medicine article on Merck's “Advantage” trial of Vioxx omitted some trial participants' deaths. Distancing himself from the Annals article, first author Jeffrey Lisse said in an interview that “Merck designed the trial, paid for the trial, ran the trial…Merck came to me after the study was completed and said, ‘We want your help to work on the paper.’ The initial paper was written at Merck, and then it was sent to me for editing”.
So, let's be clear here. Merck not only wrote the paper for the Vioxx trial, but also omitted deaths related to the trial.
The study further reveals:
There are many reports of medical journal articles being researched and written by or on behalf of pharmaceutical companies, and then published under the name of academics who had played little role earlier in the research and writing process. In extreme cases, drug companies pay for trials by contract research organizations (CROs), analyze the data in-house, have professionals write manuscripts, ask academics to serve as authors of those manuscripts, and pay communication companies to shepherd them through publication in the best journals. The resulting articles affect the conclusions found in the medical literature, and are used in promoting drugs to doctors.
Such articles are “ghostly” because signs of their actual production are largely invisible—academic authors whose names appear at the tops of ghost-managed articles give corporate research a veneer of independence and credibility.
They are “managed” because those companies shape the eventual message conveyed by the article or by a suite of articles... a substantial percentage of medical journal articles (in addition to meeting presentations and other forms of publication, which are not the focus here) are ghost managed, allowing the pharmaceutical industry considerable influence on medical research, and making that research a vehicle for marketing.
To the last point above, the reader can see how effective the practice is as a marketing vehicle for the industry to push its questionable drugs and products to doctors who then prescribe them to their patients.
The study also shows additional occurrences of such practices by Pfizer, among others.
While I am not suggested that all trials are conducted in this manner, this should, nonetheless, have the reader question the real motivation behind the development of pharmaceuticals and how they are putting potential profits ahead of the lives of sick and suffering people.
Vaccine Makers Enjoy Total Immunity from Prosecution in the United States
Source: Cornell Law 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22. Standards of responsibility
With the complicit assistance of a very corrupt US Congress, Big Pharma enjoys total immunity from prosecution since the passing of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act which completely shields them from liability when their vaccines cause injury or death of innocent babies and children – the most vulnerable members of society.
Other ill effects of this shameful act include a government-guaranteed market for this industry, much less rigorous safety requirements, and a tripling in the CDC’s vaccine schedule which greatly increases additional health risks associated with vaccines.
Congress also enacted the 21st Century Cures Act in 2016 which lowers pharmaceutical product licensing standards and deceitfully waives the requirement of informed consent towards patients in clinical trials – an abominable precedent that should not have any place in practice of medicine.
As such, it is quite apparent for all to see the sheer power of their lobbying efforts and stranglehold over spineless US politicians who have, undoubtedly, been rewarded handsomely while waiving their constituents' right to affordable and safer drugs, vaccines, and treatments.
Egregious Misdoings of Big Pharma
While there are way too many 'egregious misdoings' that have occurred over the last several decades by Big Pharma, I'd like to steer my focus on those that run the risk of affecting us all; namely, any drug, vaccine, or treatment that they are currently developing that may be forced upon us by our own subservient governments and their respective health authorities.
Before I outline several troubling instances whereby large pharmaceutical giants have coerced health authorities and doctors to push their inadequately tested and harmful, sometimes fatal, products on the masses, let me first bring to light just how easily governments around the world are being fear-porned, duped, manipulated, and coerced into establishing pushing through draconian laws - whether they are forced lockdowns & quarantines, citizen-tracking through technology, or forced testing and vaccinations - all on the back of this COVID-19 Pandemic that has, in effect and on the whole, not produced more deaths than the seasonal flu.
One need look no further than the following two examples of government overreach:
DENMARK: Last March, Denmark's parliament unanimously passed an emergency coronavirus law which gives health authorities powers to force testing, treatment and quarantine with the backing of the police. (source)
Yes, you read that correctly - forced testing, treatment, and quarantine.
While we all know that the majority of governments around the world have issued some level of quarantine or lockdown upon their citizens, not that many have actually passed laws that would force their citizens to involuntarily submit themselves to forced testing and treatments. Here is a bit more on this from the article:
As well as enforcing quarantine measures, the law also allows the authorities to force people to be vaccinated, even though there is currently no vaccination for the virus.
Forced vaccinations. This is law in Denmark. And even though no COVID-19 vaccine is currently available, once it does become available it can be force injected into Danes against their will regardless of whether the vaccine-du-jour will be deemed safe.
CANADA: In Canada, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau recently stated: “We will not be coming back to our former normal situation; we can’t do that until we have developed a vaccine and that could take 12 to 18 months….. [and]….This will be the new normal until a vaccine is developed.” (Sources: 1, 2, 3)
One has to wonder whether Trudeau really means it when he says that we cannot return to "normal" until 12 to 18 months from now. Does that mean he is willing to keep the country shutdown for that long?
Even more worrisome, we have Canada's top Health Official Theresa Tam who appeared in a recently resurfaced 2010 documentary in which she advocated using mandatory “tracking bracelets” for people who refuse to take a vaccine after a virus outbreak. Though this statement was issued in the context of a documentary, it is, nonetheless, very worrisome to say the least. You can watch the relevant video segment from the documentary via the following Twitter tweet from Resurrection Europa or via the YouTube video itself starting at the 56:50 mark:
"I think the public has to know this is one of the worst case scenarios in terms of an infectious disease outbreak. And that their cooperation is sought. And if there are people who are non-compliant, they're definitely laws and public health powers that can quarantine people in mandatory settings. Its potential you can track people, put bracelets on their arms, have police and other setups to ensure quarantine is undertaken. - Theresa Tam
While I know of no law that currently exists in Canada which would encompass such forceful powers and measures, it is certainly in the realm of possibility that they could be developed and may already be in the works through bills as we speak.
Chief Public Health Officer Theresa Tam, part of Canada's the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force. Image source: The Globe & Mail
This woman has been assigned by Trudeau as a top member of the 'the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force' and can be seen recently advocating for the use of a COVID-19 vaccine. Therefore, her power and influence has to be considered as significant. (Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4,5)
I am sure there are many other instances of plans for such overreaching laws in other countries as the two stated above. I have merely decided to show one for North America and one for Europe. And it will be up to citizens in their respective countries to keep an eye on such developing and overreaching laws that may impinge upon their rights and freedoms,
Now, with this context in mind, we can turn our attention back to the misdoings of Big Pharma who would be the ones providing (and profiting heftily from) such treatments and vaccines that they would supply and sell to governments.
Key Players in the Pharma space
As there exists hundreds, if not thousands, of pharmaceutical companies, I think it best to focus on those who are currently developing tests, vaccines and treatments for COVID-19 and who also have a not-so-saintly past with regards to dubious safety and and illegal practices.
So, who are they? Who are the "top" contenders poised to make billions from sales to governments and health care facilities around the globe? To help answer this we can begin by glancing a few articles and websites that list these drugmakers:
- CBS MarketWatch: These 21 companies are working on coronavirus treatments or vaccines — here’s where things stand (April 13, 2020)
- STAT - NIH partners with 16 drug companies in hopes of accelerating Covid-19 treatments and vaccines (April 17, 2020)
From these sources we can consider the following as notable contenders (in alphabetical order):
- Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Inovio, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Moderna, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda
And according to the Milken Institute, there are currently no less than 99 vaccines in development (See the full COVID-19 Treatment and Vaccine Tracker spreadsheet).
In aggregate, that's an astounding number of vaccines under development by pharmaceutical giants. Therefore, one can online surmise that they are in this race for profits galore from the hundreds of millions, if not billions, of doses they stand to sell to governments and health agencies.
So, for the purpose of this investigation, let's have a peek and see what we may be lurking in the dark closets of these very same pharmaceutical giants who spend, as demonstrated above, astronomical sums of money to lobby governments around the globe. Let's look at the dots.
Dots:
- MERCK - PROFITEERING/COVERING UP VACCINE RISKS: As I detailed in Part 2 Merck colluded with the CDC Director Julie Gerberding to silence CDC scientist and whistleblower William Thompson who was confirming that Merck's MMR vaccine was causing autism in black children; the scientific evidence was purposely destroyed to hide this fact and Mrs. Gerberding was rewarded after becoming head of 'Merck Vaccines' with a salary of north of 2.5 million. (Sources: 1, 2, 3)
MERCK - PROFITEERING/FRAUD/MURDER/INJURY/COVERING UP VACCINE RISKS: As I also outlined in Part 2 and is extensively documented in the scientific community (see sources listed hereafter), Merck knowingly pushed their Gardasil HPV vaccine upon girls causing numerous deaths and substantial adverse health effects to countless others for profit. (Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4)
GLAXOSMITHKLINE - PROFITEERING/COVERING UP VACCINE RISKS/INJURY/MURDER: As I referenced in Part 1, GSK (along with Merck) tested experimental HPV vaccines on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. (Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
GLAXOSMITHKLINE - BRIBERY/PROFITEERING/FRAUD/MALFEASANCE/INJURY: Back in 2012, Glaxo was fined $3 billion after admitting bribing doctors and encouraging the prescription of unsuitable antidepressants to children to increase drugs sales in the United States. Their sales reps in the US encouraged to mis-sell antidepressants Paxil and Wellbutrin and asthma treatment Advair. GSK also published an article in a medical journal that mis-stated the drug's safety for children and Copies of the misleading article were given to sales representatives to pass on to doctors in the hope that it would secure more business, according to an article from The Guardian. (Sources: 1, 2)
GLAXOSMITHKLINE - BRIBERY/PROFITEERING/MALFEASANCE/INJURY: At the height of the swine flu pandemic in 2009-10, the Pandemrix vaccine was manufactured by Glaxo and administered to high-risk groups including children and adults with asthma, diabetes and heart disease. At least 800 patients and others in the UK and Europe suffered ill-effects from the vaccine which caused brain-damage, narcolepsy, cataplexy. Prior to its distribution, Glaxo had refused to supply governments unless it was indemnified against any claim for damage caused by the vaccine; and the UK government (i.e., their taxpayers) ended up footing the bill for the damages. (Sources: 1, 2, 3)
JOHNSON & JOHNSON - PROFITEERING/FRAUD/MALFEASANCE: Even Johnson & Johnson, you know, the maker of all those baby care products, has its fair share of profiteering, fraud, malfeasance, and injury. The third-largest-ever health fraud settlement, in 2013, forced Johnson & Johnson to pay $2 billion for violations involving, among other drugs, Risperdal. (see the US Department of Justice's Nov. 4, 2013 report with a sub-header Allegations Include Off-label Marketing and Kickbacks to Doctors and Pharmacists for details). (Sources: 1, 2, 3)
PFIZER - MALFEASANCE/DEATHS/PROFITEERING: Back in 2009, Dutch authorities pulled Pfizer's infant vaccine Prevnar (Prevenar in Europe) after 3 died within two weeks of receiving the shots. Though Pfizer only hatled the batch that was related to the deaths, no other Prevenar batches were suspended and infants in the Netherlands continued to be vaccinated; and apparently, no proper investigation of the deaths by the pharmaceutical giant were conducted. At the time, the vaccine was one of the most widely used in the world and generated sales for U.S. drugmaker Wyeth (who was acquired by Pfizer) of $2.7 billion in 2008. (Sources: 1, 2)
PFIZER / SANOFI - MALFEASANCE/DEATHS/PROFITEERING: Nine years ago, Japan’s health ministry halted the use of vaccines made by Pfizer Inc and Sanofi-Aventis SA that prevent meningitis and pneumonia following the deaths of four children. The infants died shortly after receiving the vaccines. The vaccines in question were Pfizer’s Prevenar and Sanofi’s ActHIB. As per the Reuters article on this event, three of the children also received a mixed vaccine against diphtheria, whooping cough and tetanus on the same day they received the other vaccines; which appears to have been a contributing factor. (Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4)
There's a wealth of scientific evidence that demonstrates that combination vaccines (such as the MMR vaccine) are much more likely to cause adverse effects and deaths in recipients, particularly babies and infants whose immune systems are simply overwhelmed and overloaded with heavy doses of diseases (vaccines) all at once.
Despite this, pharmaceutical giants such as Pfizer and Merck have negligently failed to conduct related studies and issue adequate recommendations for the administration of their vaccines to their clients (i.e., doctors, medical practitioners, hospitals, and health care centers) in this respect.
Apart from this appalling practice of injecting combination doses of vaccines in babies and infants, the pharmaceutical giants have also continued to included dangerous ingredients and adjuvants - such as mercury, aluminum, and thimerosal - in their vaccines knowing full well that they render severe adverse effects (particularly neurological ones), significantly contribute to Autism and other severe health conditions. Med Science Research has and extensive database of thousands of published medical studies which document these specific issues in the industry. These appear in PubMed which has more than 30 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books.
The Scope & Pervasiveness of Big Pharma Fraud
To highlight the pervasiveness of the fraud and misconduct committed by Big Pharma companies (many that I've listed above), we need only have a glance at the following table which was produced for a March 2018 report entitled Twenty-Seven Years of Pharmaceutical Industry Criminal and Civil Penalties: 1991 Through 2017 (PDF) written by four medical doctors and published by Public Citizen to really get a sense of the size and scope of this systemic (and endemic?) problem. Here are the highlights preceded by a description:
Source: Table 4 from the Twenty-Seven Years of Pharmaceutical Industry Criminal and Civil Penalties: 1991 Through 2017 (PDF)
Over this time span (from 1991 to 2017) we are talking about $38 billion in total financial penalties from these 20 pharmaceutical giants alone and that, only in the United States - not including fines and penalties in other countries.
If anyone would dare to tally the aggregate for this 20 companies across multiple countries, the figure would undoubtedly be astronomical and quite indicative of their collective misdoings and profiteering.
Conclusion for this section
I have merely scratched the surface or chipped at the tip of the iceberg with regards to the orgy of fraud, profiteering, malfeasance, and outright criminality committed by Big Pharma.
I am not suggesting that these, and other, pharmaceutical companies are only out to make a profit and don't have good products that help countless patients improve and recover from their illnesses.
The point I am trying to illustrate, however, is that due to their proven track record of misdoings and profiteering at the expense of patients around the globe, we should not only question whether the vaccine, drug, or treatment they develop for the COVID-19 (or subsequent) disease will have been developed in an honest, open, safe, trustworthy way with the best interest of people in mind, or whether it will be merely for profiteering.
Time will tell.
Meanwhile, I suggest that we all keep a keen eye on these top pharmaceutical companies as they gradually start to introduce the masses and governments to their upcoming cures for the current pandemic.
We need to question who are they partnering with, who is helping to fund them, and what is their track record with regards to safety, efficacy, ethics, and relationships with industry practitioners, physicians, medical institutions, medical journals, and the like.
Are you willing to do our own homework, or will you leave it up to them and take their word for it all?
ADDENDUM:
I just noticed that the fine work of @geke (on Steemit.com and Hive.blog) merits some attention. She is famous on the liberty-loving platform for her extensive work in creating Venn diagrams that document the inter-linkages between multinational corporations and the U.S. Government.
More specifically, she details the "revolving door" phenomenon that exists between Government and Corporations along with how their lobbyists get thrown into the mix.
This set of records offers yet another view into how Big Pharma works to usurp government policy with regards to health care and who gets rewarded in the process.
Here are but a few instances from the fruits of her labor:
General Pharmaceutical:
Image source
Bayer:
CVS Health:
GlaxoSmithKline:
Merck:
Novartis:
Pfizer:
Roche:
Image source
Note that I am not personally pro- or anti-vaccine; I am for truth and honesty in their development, testing, distribution, and supervision - all of which, currently, are grossly lacking, as will be extensively documented and demonstrated in the upcoming parts.
Continue with PART 5 - The Gavi Alliance.
Once completed, I intend to put everything together in a single PDF downloadable file for easier sharing and distribution.
Comments and re-blogs are more than welcome!
In Peace & Liberty,