Fellow Hoosier here! Thanks for the video and your thoughts. I have a pretty solid position in EOS but I agree with you on a lot of your points. The whole premise of an account being deleted after 3 years of no activity is just fuel for the FUDsters for sure. There is no reason for a rule like that to be in the constitution.
Also I agree with you that like we see with STEEM there are ninja miners / founders and some of the original Witnesses that won't ever be "knocked off the horse" no matter what they do. I think we will see a similar type thing with the EOS block producers. They will get up there and then be able to make friends with other block producers and they will basically be in place into eternity which could certainly be viewed as an issue.
The third point I wanted to mention that I agree with you on is that the system is complex enough that even technical people are having problems getting their barrings which could cause issues on down the road as people try to build the system out. There is a lack of documentation for a lot of things in the system so I feel like people at Block.one understand tons more than the community who is trying to build on this system. I'm one of the only people with technical videos out on EOS but that was a month ago and I'm meaning to make more but it is often to complicated to get very much viewership but it helps me understand the system better. It is confusing though for sure.
And you are right. Calling it an Ethereum Killer is getting a lot of people triggered. LOL I don't think it will kill Ethereum. Ethereum will remain as a main artery in crypto but personally I don't feel that any meaningful applications will be built on Ethereum because it can't handle the capacity until it scales.
RE: Addressing EOS