'What kind of dispute?'
Censorship of an onchain dapp - as per the example in the article.
'If a constitution is not a valid multiparty contract, then it's basically just a wishlist of how the users would like everyone to behave.'
Agreed and that's exactly my point. Without actionable rules and consequences it's pointless.
And if BPs can simply ignore ECAF rulings, again, what's the point?
The businesses built on EOS will be dapps, I'm not recommending disputes go unresolved, just move arbitration to the layer of the dapp(s).
RE: Proposal for an incremental Constitution and Dapp layer governance on EOS