If the Constitution was designed to be vague as you say - then it has succeeded.
No - those are your words. I won't respond to that strawman, instead better to concentrate on what I said:
Your implied criticism of the Constitution that there aren't the stated actions of enforcement e.g., Article I. That's exactly how it should be. ...
A founding document such as that in EOS should always be brief and principled. Elsewise nobody will read it and understand it.
RE: Proposal for an incremental Constitution and Dapp layer governance on EOS