It is currently certain that Ethereum has fizzled its motivation as a really decentralized system. The control practiced by the Ethereum Foundation and its negligence for the supposition of the network, and – maybe most stunning – the developing grouping of mining assets in the hands of ASIC makers – vouch for the way that centralization in the Ethereum arrange is developing. Vitalik Buterin as of late expressed that Ethereum will present charges for facilitating brilliant contracts on Ethereum. At present, there is just a one-time arrangement expense; notwithstanding, sooner rather than later engineers should continue paying for their dApps to remain online. Proof-of-Work remains the fundamental agreement convention used in the digital money space, primarily because of the way that it is utilized by the two biggest blockchains – Bitcoin and Ethereum. However, PoW is exceedingly wasteful and lies at the base of numerous issues looked by these dispersed systems.
Ethereum framework:
Ethereum Classic Vision is worked as a propelled, quick, simple to-scale, and exceedingly decentralized framework, and Proof-of-Stake obviously does not relate to these targets. Accordingly, after an underlying period when the stage will utilize PoW, a change to PoS will be done. Dissimilar to Ethereum, which will most likely experience an extensive incomplete testing stage (with one shutout of 100 approved utilizing PoS), Ethereum Classic Vision will execute an increasingly conclusive and certain change. We solidly trust that presenting a progressive update in a very constrained shape can just destabilize the system, delay talks, make disunity and eventually do a full switch unthinkable.
Energy proficiency:
PoW-based blockchains are famously wasteful with regards to power. Bitcoin mining alone expends 0.33% of the worldwide vitality use - more than the entire nation of Denmark (or any of other 150 nations, including most conditions of Africa). Power spent on only one BTC exchange could control a normal family for an entire month. This wastefulness is caused by the way that all validators as excavators in a PoW arrange a deal with understanding each square at the same time, searching for an answer for a cryptographic riddle that changes like clockwork. On the other hand, running a PoS hub does not require much vitality: it tends to be finished utilizing any PC or even a cell phone.
Fair circulation of remunerations:
Verification of-Stake systems don't have square rewards – they offer just exchange expenses to validators. While these are normally lower than the standard square reward in ETH or BTC, the subsequent long haul benefits are similar to those acquired with PoW, since operational expenses are so low. Thus, even a client with a fundamental $40 Raspberry Pi PC can turn into a validator, as long as the individual in question stakes enough coins (which will turn out a lot less expensive than purchasing a mining rig). All clients are placed in equivalent conditions while gaining rewards with a framework like Ethereum Classic Vision.
Resource efficiency
Lower costs mean that ETCV mining will be profitable for individual miners with hardware as simple as Raspberry Pi
Stability:
ETCV holders earn more coins by staking them, so there is no motive to sell – thus, the price of ETCV will rise steadily instead of plunging
Security
If a block validator breaks the rules or acts maliciously, they lose their staked deposit and status
Real decentralization
There is no risk that gigantic mining pools will take over the control of the ETCV blockchain – it will remain independent from any central authority
Roadmap of Ethereum Classic Vision:
Follow the below link for about Ethereum Classic Vision : Whitepaper: https://ethereumcv.io/whitepaper.pdf
Website: https://ethereumcv.io/#subscribe
My BitcoinTalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2310112