It's not about why or who's account it is. It's about the precedent.
To take your example:
There was never a reason for me to punch anyone. I never thought about it, it was never an option in my mind or anyone else.
The precedent that you have created is, that now, if I feel threatened, that it's justified to punch while before there was never a reason to punch. It was never an option!
But now it is.
The problem is once a precedent to punch has been created other reasons will follow. This is how it always goes.
The same goes for freezing accounts.
There was never a reason to freeze an account. I never thought about it, it was never an option in my mind or anyone else.
You guys opened a box and allowed the first precedent to escape. Freezing accounts are now justified under 'uncertain' circumstances.
Now that the first account has been frozen other precedents to freeze accounts will follow. The idea is now out there.
It can even happen while some of the original top 20 witnesses are long gone.
You guys opened a box that should have never been opened.
Steem will never be the same.
RE: Vlog 459: A sad day for Steem