I've been running @jpbliberty's Class Action Lawsuit against Facebook, Google and Twitter's Crypto Ad Ban for over a year now.
The one objection I hear most, including from people in the Crypto Industry itself, is: "But there were so many scams". I've heard people saying that over 80% of ICOs were scams.
Well ITS A BIG LIE!
And one that was used by Facebook etc to cover their own illegal conduct.
I've done a detailed investigation of this issue and found that the level of scams in late 2017 / early 2018 was quite low and that most Crypto Projects and actual ICOs were legitimate.
The allegation that most of the Crypto Industry were scams and billions were lost in ICO scams is patently false and lacking in any real evidence.
It is mostly just 3rd hand hearsay and trolling of competing projects.
The number and value of actual scams compared to the size of the crypto industry is small.
Official Government Statistics on Scams
The Australian consumer regulator (ACCC) did a detailed study of scams in 2018 and put out an official government report.
This is what the report finds:
- Out of $489M in scam losses only a tiny percentage (1.25%; $6.1M) related to cryptocurrency in any way.
- Of that 2/3rd were just other scams asking to be paid in cryptocurrency. Cryptocurrency investment scam losses were less than half a percent of total losses ($2.1).
- Most of those were just impersonating cryptocurrency projects. Losses from scams where the Australian Tax Office was impersonated were twice as large as scams where cryptocurrency projects were impersonated!
I have not been able to find a single example on the ACCC's scamwatch site of an actual cryptocurrency project ICO that was a scam.
Compared to the size of the Crypocurrency Industry, even in Australia, the percentage of scams is very low.
Huge numbers of legitimate Crypto projects
Here is a link to an infographic showing a huge number of legitimate cryptocurrency projects competing with the existing tech players in every area. I did not put this together, but have looked into many of the projects listed and have not found a single scam. https://medium.com/@matteozago/why-the-net-giants-are-worried-about-the-web-3-0-44b2d3620da5
Big Lie comes from one flawed report
Tellingly for a Big Lie, all the news allegations about a very high percentage of ICOs being scams can be traced back to a single flawed report by a group called Satis (misnamed in Crypto media reports as Statis).
I don't know who they are and they have no official status.
But under the terms of their own report (page 23) they classified Reddit and other social media posts about an ICO that other people said was a scam as an ICO scam.
This is their definition of a "scam"
Identified Scam (pre-trading): Any project that expressed availability of ICO investment (through a website
publishing, ANN thread, or social media posting with a contribution address), did not have/had no intention of
fulfilling project development duties with the funds, and/or was deemed by the community (message boards,
website or other online information) to be a scam.
Thus their definition of a scam is just based on trolling and defamation of competing projects on social media.
This is an entirely flawed methodology and is legally third hand hearsay.
There is no evidence cited that anyone lost any money on these projects, or that they were actually fraudulent.
They also admit that the vast majority of money lost on so called ICO scams was in just 3 scams.
Thus they vastly inflated both the number of ICOs and the number of scams based unverified, defamatory hearsay and trolling.
Anyone can say another project is a scam. It doesn't make it so.
Failed projects are not scams. 95% of all tech startups in all areas will fail.
That is the nature of innovation and capitalism.
And I’m not the only one calling out the vast overuse of the word “scam” in the Crypto Industry. Here is Naomi Brockwell (@skycorridors) on the topic 
& 
Technical requirements make real ICO scams rare
An ICO in late 2017 / early 2018 required smart contracts to be set up on the Ethereum (or other) blockchain. A simple Reddit post does not constitute an ICO. And other people calling it a scam on social media doesn't make it one. The level of unjustified and defamatory attacks on other projects in the Crypto Industry is high. It is not evidence of a real scam.
The technical requirements for actually sending money to an ICO and receiving ICO tokens during late 2017 & early 2018 were pretty high and certainly not for naive investors.
- Having purchased or mined Ethereum (ETH);
- Sending the ETH to your own cryptocurrency wallet;
- Sending ETH from your own wallet to the ICO wallet.
No one without a decent understanding of Crypto could even work out how to do this! So the people who lost money in real ICO scams knew about crypto in detail and were, in that sense, experienced investors.
I note here that because of the very large amounts of money that early crypto true believers made and were looking to reinvest, the huge numbers of projects available to invest in, and the practical limitations on individual investor's time, the strategy of just putting some money in everything your heard of, without doing due diligence, was a legitimate investment strategy.
Yes, you might lose some money to scams, but it made sure you had money early in the projects that would be hugely successful and make up for all the other failed and (few) scam projects.
So this is the BIG LIE that Facebook used to cover its own illegal banning of all crypto industry ads on 30 Jan 2018.
Signup for the Crypto Class Action against Facebook & Google's Crypto Ad Ban
