Recently I've gotten into sky-watching and studying the effects of geoengineering, ranging from what is told publicly to alternative facts.
I don't entirely agree that the government is doing this to purposefully to harm us. Granted, MKUltra happened - however - no-one does something to be a villain. Those responsible for chem-trails may believe they are doing it to protect, but doing damage by not being public about the harmful side-effects.
Although it'd be impossible for those responsible to say "We have found nothing dangerous in these supposed chemtrails" as that would go against the chemtrail conspiracy, so it's difficult to 100% conclude this is happening when anyone can be lying. All that can be done is provide proof and counter evidence with reliable, opposing evidence. That's how science develops.
Something I realized and have to question: What if people are paid to talk about chemtrails when there are none in a specific situation? Just to rile up those who believe in the chemtrail conspiracy and send them searching for red herons? Is that possible?
Sorry for the long comment, I just really enjoyed this post.
RE: Media and Geoengineering