How 400 Years Grand Solar Minimum Affects Our Society

This video was originally published 10/6/2019

As I mentioned earlier, Climate Change Litigation 3.0 is created so Environmental Groups can go after the government. So, Australia is set to bring action against their government for failing to mitigate risks, but before they do, I hope they will join us in understanding how the Grand Solar Minimum, the cycle of repeat in every 400 years, affects s and climate patterns on century or millennia scales.

We need to look to the past and see how events affected our society. How will the society react when they understand that their retirements will not be there; that what they thought of investing for the future will not be there anymore? There is going to be a massive shift in the economy, once they understand what is going on with the GSM.

Individuals are going to use that money, which is supposed to be for future investment, to prepare for what the Grand Solar Minimum brings. They are not going to be thinking about the 401K, rather, they will be more concerned about the harvest season of 2021 and beyond, or how their families are going to continue to eat.

Even something as innocuous as indoor agriculture, which is supposed to help the environment with hydroponic lettuce, needs to go under one of these studies if legislation is passed. Directors of these facilities do not do a mitigation study, they could be sued.

Keep in mind that these same people, who are directing this policy conversation, are the same people who had given us strings of bad calls after bad calls on how the warming climate will behave. This article below is one example, “Why Antarctica will soon be the only place to live — literally”, because as “experts” have said, everywhere else in the planet will be so hot, and would not be livable due to runaway Global Warming. Experts also said that we can move to Antarctica because it would melt, and a lush forest would be there. Take note, this statement is from the government’s chief scientist, Professor Sir David King.

Then, in another headline, “Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past”. Maybe except for all the record snows around the globe such as, snow in Grand Canyon in June, record snowpack in the Sierra Nevada Mountains, record snow in Italy, unusual record snows across North Africa, and the long list continues to include Asia, South America, Australia, and the super early record snows in New Zealand.

Definitely, snow is just a thing of the ‘past’, as guaranteed by Professor Jarich Oosten from University of Leiden in the Netherlands, and David Parker from Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research in Berkshire.

Parker should have his funding removed. He cannot say something like this in the year 2000, and then now, globally record snowfall events. He even had the nerve to say that people could just hope to ‘feel’ virtual cold, because our children will never know what snow is. But still, these same people are leading this policy charge!

Additionally, what other kind of bad bogus calls could there be than this, “Environmentalists predicted the end of spring snowfall”? Are you exempting all the spring snowfalls that we have had?

Look at this chart from Finnish Meteorological Institute, does it look like the spring snowfall ended? The orange circle shows how far above the baseline for spring snowfall. That is many standard deviations above the averages, which seems to be very inconvenient.

I am sure they are going to try to erase that if they could, because it makes the Union for Concerned Scientists, look bad; because these bold predictions came from their organization. Well, I am a concerned citizen as well, and my call is, why are we still listening to these ‘concerned’ scientists, who are so far off with their bad calls?

Then “concerned scientists” have this point on “The end of skiing.” How many times have we heard this? We have heard the end of skiing across North America, Canada, and Australia; but now several areas in North America are going to stay open until August because there is still so much extra snow. This same extended snow season was also the case last year in Australia. Now, Australia has super early snow season, with record snows; so, they are going to open the slopes early. But people, like Terry Root, senior fellow at the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment, still get airtime; even with all these bad calls they report again and again.

When you try to check and backtrack the linked articles provided in the description box; this is what you find: “Sorry — we can’t find that page.” Because it was a bad call about snowfall being a thing in the past.

This is interesting as well, what about all the support groups for the ‘snowplow drivers’? They are going to lose their jobs. They needed to hire more snowplow drivers this year anyway to keep up with all the record snows. I guess this cartoon kind of sums up all the madness in our world.

In relation to this, how many times have we heard, “The Arctic would be ‘ice-free’ by now? Gore said these in 2008, echoing what the American scientist Wieslaw Maslowsk said in 2007; and almost all Institutes across the planet are calling for ‘ice-free’ in the Arctic.

Let’s look at the Arctic, to check how much volume of ice there is in June 9, 2019. The black line is 2019, and as can be seen, it is above several other years. As we descend into the low-melt season, that is going to be above every year included in the chart, which includes 2018, the blue line. Now, focus your attention on that blue line for September. It is above everything else. That was last year at the low melt season, with the most ice in umpteen years. That is the lowest amount of ice melt there could be in a season, going into September, but nobody talked about that because that was too inconvenient to implement global carbon taxes.

As for all these predictions of runaway Global Warming, here is a data from University of Alabama Huntsville (UAH) showing lower troposphere temperatures in May. As you can see, it is 0.32 degrees Celsius above the baseline. We were told that we will be running up to 2 degrees Celsius or above, but here we are with 0.3C, six times less. Expert predictions are not coming true, and now, they are trying to put new litigation in place. I want to call the attention of any attorneys out there, when they do talk about these mitigation studies, please discuss the effects of the Grand Solar Minimum; because what you have to mitigate against, is not defined in the law.

Thanks for reading, I hope you got something out of the article. If you like more information like this, I produce the tri-weekly Mini Ice Age Conversations podcast, 30 minutes of in-depth analysis on the GSM you can take on the go.

Mini Ice Age Conversations Podcast

iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/adapt2030

Soundcloud https://soundcloud.com/adapt-2030

Libsyn http://adapt2030.libsyn.com/

(MIAC #224) Protect the Narrative at All Costs as New Grow Zones Emerge

http://adapt2030.libsyn.com/podcast/miac-224-protect-the-narrative-at-all-costs-as-new-grow-zones-emerge

- - -

For the bi-weekly Grand Solar Minimum climate update newsletter from myself, David DuByne, (ADAPT 2030) jump over to oilseedcrops.org you can enter your email and sign up. Move your mouse around for about 10 seconds and this box will pop up.

Join ADAPT 2030 NEWSLETTER http://www.oilseedcrops.org