Update From: BZ @ I UV
BZ has posted 3 emails, two from 8.16.17 and a third from 8.17.17, from HATJ to Lisa Shannon on the I UV website. They follow below (-:
First:
From: TUCCI-JARRAF HEATHER ANN (86748007)
Sent Date: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 7:36 PM
To: lisa_shannon@sbcglobal.net
Subject: RE: RKB Request
did he cancel the true bill and case? and if yes, was the cancellation done after he did the purported
“arraingnment”? if yes, all is good…
one IS self…explain to me how one requests to be self? lol
give me a bit, i will come back later tonight with something appropriate…lol
LOVE YOU BEYOND MEASURE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
—–Shannon, Lisa on 8/16/2017 4:21 PM wrote:
Hi Honey
RKB Would like input on what to do about previous not guilty plea at prior arraignment
Now requesting Pro Se – Hearing scheduled for August 29 to put his request for Pro Se to judge
Love You Beyond Measure
———————————————–
Second:
From: TUCCI-JARRAF HEATHER ANN (86748007)
Sent Date: Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:35 AM
To: lisa_shannon@sbcglobal.net
Subject: still here…lol
i am still here…lol… currently accumulating my hourly fee of 2.16 quadrillion usd payable in pre-1933 gold and silver from “FBOP”, “fbi’, “us marshalls”, “fed court”, etc…with Original Issues ready to go.
“shipping” will occur between now and next wednesday…maximum shifting being done at all levels…and i am in complete gratitude for all doing.
for r and everyone: they do not have due jurisdiction (personam or subject matter) and authority, period…and until they establish DUE jurisdiction and authority (which they cannot…EVER), they cannot ask for a plea, they cannot
ask for anyone to waive purported rights to counsel, nor even ask for your name, etc.
In the event they believe they have duly presumed, inclusive of presuming jurisdiction to be able to ask for a plea, etc., it was already taken care of… it was already duly established, secured, and perfected, as a due matter of
public record (the perpetuity, amendments, ft), four and half years ago, that said presumptions were prohibited from being duly established, and rendered null, void, and cancelled at inception of being made, for due cause, “nunc pro tunc” and “praeterea preterea”…that has been the case in America since September 2012…and globally since october 2012…all of that is clearly and DULY expressed, secured, perfected, and a matter of public universal record, since november, 2012 DECLARATION OF FACTS.
However, feeeeel free to duly cancel any such presumptions again. Easy peasy.
and……for those that still seek to create presumptions and are just “testa (friggin’) dura”….the script is very focused:
“It has been duly established, secured, and perfected, as a due matter of public record, that the purported
(prosecutor/da/general/state) does not have the due jurisdiction and authority to make this purported action
against me, nunc pro tunc, praeterea preterea.”
“It has been duly established, secured, and perfected, as a due matter of public record, that this purported
(court/judge name) does not have the due jurisdiction and authority to hear this purported action against me, nunc pro tunc, praeterea preterea.”
“It is duly established, secured, and perfected, as a due matter of public record, that you (judge) do not have the due jurisdiction and authority to ask me that question, thusly, to answer that question would violate my deeply held religious dictates.”
LOVE YOU ALLLLLLLLL!
——————————————————
Third:
From: TUCCI-JARRAF HEATHER ANN (86748007)
To: lisa_shannon@sbcglobal.net
Sent Date: Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:49 AM
Subject: CORRECTION!
CORRECTION OF SCRIPT, THIRD PHRASE:
“It has been duly established, secured, and perfected, and is a due matter of public universal record, that you (judge) do not have the due jurisdiction and authority to ask me that question, nunc pro tunc, praeterea preterea, and thusly, to answer said question would be a violation of my deeply held religious dictates.”
bella giornata a tutti!!!!!!!
God bless! Love and Light 💓 ~AlⒾce Gypsy Rose~