This is impressive.
The clarity of your pro-bono legal counsel to the possible plaintiffs identified as victims of crime occurring out of the hard fork .23 is a valuable offering. Not just to plaintiffs, users and future cases of similar precedence but for the future of what a blockchain can be adapted to do.
It is not the imagination which limits the future, nor the unexpected resulting in the unforeseen - the limit of future adapation (for now) is the needs (of us, of all?) which have not yet been met.
RE: Pro Bono Legal Opinion for Victims of Steem HF23 & Bittrex