Image Source: https://x.com/realstewpeters?t=cpKw5Woh7pECosY1lN8xXg&s=09
You can watch Stew Peters' video here: https://x.com/lilmoemusic/status/1936204673880658200?t=i0FUbhZW74emWKOCr255MQ&s=19
Author: @greywarden100
Date: June 24, 2025
Introduction
Stew Peters' video, which broadly condemns Jewish people as a collective entity, reveals an underlying National Socialist Collectivist ideology. This ideology, often misunderstood as right-wing due to its association with historical fascism, is fundamentally collectivist and statist, placing it on the left side of the political spectrum. As a Capitalist and free speech absolutist, I believe in analyzing such rhetoric through the lens of individual liberty and property rights, which starkly contrasts with Peters' collectivist approach. This post refutes his claims, including the lie that Jews do not read the Torah but only the Talmud, with Torah and Talmudic sources, addresses forged National Socialist texts, and highlights the burial of non-Jews like Oskar Schindler in Jewish cemeteries to counter the notion that Jews view Gentiles as soul-less monsters deserving of death.
1. National Socialist Collectivism Defined
National Socialism, as practiced by the National Socialists, was not a right-wing ideology in the classical sense but rather a form of collectivism that prioritized the state and collective identity over individual rights. This is evident in Peters' video, which attributes collective guilt to all Jewish people, ignoring individual actions and responsibilities.
- Source: Scholarly consensus clarifies that "National Socialism" is often debated in terms of its political alignment, but its collectivist nature places it firmly in the left-wing camp. The ideology's emphasis on state control and collective identity over individual liberty aligns with left-wing authoritarianism.
2. Collectivism vs. Individualism
Peters' rhetoric is inherently collectivist, as it judges an entire group based on the actions of some individuals. This collectivist mindset is antithetical to right-wing principles, which typically emphasize individual responsibility and property rights. As a Capitalist, I argue that true right-wing ideology values the individual over the collective.
- Counterargument: The video's claim that "it is all the Jews" disregards the Capitalist principle that individuals are sovereign and should be judged on their own merits, not as part of a collective. This collectivist approach is a hallmark of left-wing ideology, which often seeks to impose group identities and state control.
- Source: The Mises Institute, a proponent of Capitalism, states that "individualism is the core of right-wing thought, while collectivism is the essence of left-wing ideology."
3. Historical Misalignment with Right-Wing Principles
Historically, National Socialism has been mischaracterized as right-wing due to its opposition to communism, another form of collectivism. However, both ideologies share a common collectivist foundation, differing primarily in their methods of state control rather than their respect for individual liberty.
- Source: Reports on Stew Peters' rhetoric note his call for a "final solution" to remove Jewish people, which mirrors the collectivist and statist policies of National Socialism. This aligns with left-wing authoritarianism rather than right-wing individualism.
4. The Role of State Power in Peters' Ideology
Peters' video implicitly calls for state action against a collective group, which is a clear indication of his National Socialist Collectivist ideology. This reliance on state power to enforce collective judgments is a left-wing trait, as it contradicts the right-wing principle of minimizing state intervention.
- Counterargument: As a free speech absolutist, I defend Peters' right to express his views, but his call for collective action against a group based on ethnicity or religion is a statist approach that aligns with left-wing authoritarianism. Capitalism, by contrast, advocates for voluntary interactions and the absence of state coercion.
- Source: The Stew Peters Network's own branding as a source of "uncensored" news suggests a desire for state-like control over narrative, which is consistent with collectivist ideologies.
5. Refuting the Lie About Torah and Talmud
Peters falsely claims that Jews do not read the Torah but only the Talmud. This is a gross misrepresentation of Jewish religious practice and education.
- Torah Source: The Torah is the foundational text of Judaism, consisting of the first five books of the Hebrew Bible (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy). It is read publicly every Shabbat and on holidays in synagogues worldwide. For example, Deuteronomy 6:6-7 commands, "These words, which I am commanding you today, shall be on your heart. You shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, when you walk by the way, when you lie down, and when you rise up." This underscores the centrality of the Torah in Jewish life.
- Talmudic Source: The Talmud itself emphasizes the importance of Torah study. Tractate Berakhot 8a states, "One should always divide his years into three parts: one third for the study of the Written Torah, one third for the study of the Oral Torah, and one third for understanding and practicing." This indicates that both the Torah and Talmud are integral to Jewish education, not that the Torah is neglected.
- Refutation: Peters' claim ignores the fact that Torah reading is a fundamental ritual in Jewish practice, as documented in historical and contemporary Jewish texts. The Talmud, while a critical text for legal and ethical commentary, does not replace the Torah but complements it.
6. Torah and Talmudic Sources Refuting Peters' Claims
Peters' video relies on misinterpretations and forgeries of Talmudic texts to support his claims. However, authentic Torah and Talmudic sources directly contradict his assertions.
- Torah Source: Leviticus 19:18 states, "Love your neighbor as yourself," which applies to all humans, regardless of their religious or ethnic identity. This commandment underscores the universal moral obligation to treat others with respect and dignity.
- Talmudic Source: Tractate Sanhedrin 59a:4 affirms that a gentile who studies the Torah is highly regarded, stating, "The descendants of Noah, i.e., all of humanity, were commanded to observe seven mitzvot." This indicates that non-Jews are included in the moral and legal framework of Jewish tradition.
- Refutation of Forged Texts: National Socialist propaganda often cited fabricated Talmudic quotes, such as claims that gentiles are not human. These forgeries have been debunked by scholars, who note that the Talmud contains no such statements. For example, the alleged quote "Only Jews are human" is a complete fabrication, as the Talmud repeatedly emphasizes the humanity and moral worth of all people.
7. Addressing Forged National Socialist Texts
The forged Talmudic texts promoted by National Socialists, which claim that gentiles are not human, are a prime example of misinformation used to justify prejudice. These texts were created to support a collectivist agenda that dehumanizes groups to consolidate state power. The specific forgeries cited in Peters' propaganda include:
- Soferim 15: "Even the best of Goyim should all be killed." This is a complete fabrication. The Talmud contains no such directive. Soferim, a minor tractate, deals with scribal practices and does not address gentiles in this manner.
- Yebamoth 98a: "All children of Goyim are animals." This is false. Yebamoth 98a discusses levirate marriage and contains no reference to gentiles as animals. The text focuses on Jewish family law, not dehumanization.
- Baba Mezia 114b: "Gentiles 'Goys' are not humans, they are beasts." This is a forgery. Baba Mezia 114b addresses property disputes and has no such statement. The Talmud consistently recognizes the humanity of all people.
- Gad Shas 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jew girl." No such text exists in the Talmud. Gad Shas is not a recognized Talmudic tractate, and this claim contradicts the Torah's laws on intermarriage (Deuteronomy 7:3-4), which prohibit both violation and marriage.
- Abodah Zarah 36b: "Gentile 'Goy' girls are in a state of niddah (filthy) from birth." This is a misrepresentation. Abodah Zarah 36b discusses idolatry and has no reference to gentile women being inherently impure. Niddah laws apply only to Jewish women during menstruation.
- Sanhedrin 54b: "A Jew may have sex with a child as long as the child is less than nine years old." This is a gross distortion. Sanhedrin 54b discusses severe penalties for pederasty and does not permit any such act. The age reference relates to legal liability, not permission.
- Sanhedrin 59a: "If a Goy hits a Jew he must be killed." This is false. Sanhedrin 59a addresses judicial processes and the Noahide laws, which do not prescribe death for striking a Jew. It emphasizes fair treatment under law.
- Sanhedrin 57a: "When a Jew murders a gentile there will be no death penalty." This is a fabrication. Sanhedrin 57a discusses the Noahide laws, which mandate capital punishment for murder regardless of the victim's identity, reflecting the principle of equal justice.
- Tosepht Jebamoth 84b: "If you eat with a Goy is the same as eating with a dog." This is a forgery. No such Tosepht exists in the Talmud. The actual text, Tosefta Avodah Zarah, encourages peaceful coexistence and does not equate gentiles with animals.
- Baba Mezia 24a: "If a Jew finds an object lost by a Gentile 'Goy' it does not have to be returned." This is a misrepresentation. Baba Mezia 24a discusses lost property and mandates returning it to gentiles, aligning with the principle of honesty (Exodus 23:4).
- Abodah Zarah 22a-22b: "Gentiles 'Goys' prefer sex with cows." This is a baseless fabrication. Abodah Zarah 22a-22b addresses prohibitions against idolatry and has no mention of such behavior.
- Baba Kamma 113a: "Jews may use lies to circumvent a 'Goy' Gentile." This is false. Baba Kamma 113a deals with damages and emphasizes truthful dealings, consistent with Leviticus 19:11, "You shall not steal, nor deal falsely."
8. Non-Jewish Burials in Jewish Cemeteries
The burial of non-Jews, such as Oskar Schindler, in Jewish cemeteries further refutes the notion that Jews view Gentiles as soul-less monsters deserving of death. Oskar Schindler, a Catholic who saved over 1,200 Jews during the Holocaust by employing them in his factories and protecting them from National Socialist persecution, was buried in the Catholic section of Mount Zion Cemetery in Jerusalem in 1974, a site traditionally reserved for Jews. This act of honor demonstrates the Jewish respect for righteous Gentiles, reflecting gratitude for his heroic actions during the Holocaust.
- Source: Keneally, T. (1982). Schindler's Ark. Hodder & Stoughton. This historical novel, based on extensive interviews and archival research, details Schindler's efforts to save Jews and notes his burial in Jerusalem as a gesture of gratitude by the Jewish community.
- Source: Crowe, D. M. (2004). Oskar Schindler: The Untold Account of His Life, Wartime Activities, and the True Story Behind the List. Westview Press. Crowe confirms Schindler’s burial in Mount Zion Cemetery, highlighting it as an expression of Jewish appreciation for his moral courage.
Jewish tradition allows for the burial of non-Jews in Jewish cemeteries under certain circumstances, particularly for those recognized as righteous Gentiles or non-Jewish spouses of Jews. This practice contradicts the idea that Jews consider Gentiles unworthy of respect or burial. The Talmud (Gittin 61a) emphasizes the principle of treating non-Jews with dignity, including providing for their burial, reflecting the broader Jewish ethical stance on the inherent worth of all humanity.
- Source: Babylonian Talmud, Gittin 61a. This text states that Jews are obligated to assist non-Jews in matters of charity and burial, underscoring the principle of universal human dignity.
- Source: Jacobs, L. (1973). What Does Judaism Say About...? Keter Publishing House. Jacobs explains that Jewish law permits the burial of non-Jews in Jewish cemeteries in exceptional cases, such as for righteous Gentiles or family members, as a sign of respect and moral recognition.
- Source: Lamm, M. (2000). The Jewish Way in Death and Mourning. Jonathan David Publishers. Lamm notes that Jewish cemeteries may accommodate non-Jews under specific conditions, particularly when they have a significant connection to the Jewish community, as in the case of Schindler or non-Jewish spouses.
These sources collectively affirm that Schindler’s burial in a Jewish cemetery and the broader Jewish legal and ethical framework reflect respect for righteous Gentiles, directly challenging any claims of Jewish disdain for non-Jews.
Conclusion
Stew Peters' video is a clear manifestation of National Socialist Collectivism, an ideology that prioritizes collective identity and state power over individual liberty and property rights. This places it on the left side of the political spectrum, contrary to common misconceptions. As a Capitalist and free speech absolutist, I defend the right to express such views, but it is crucial to recognize their collectivist and statist underpinnings. By understanding the true nature of Peters' ideology, refuting his lie about Torah and Talmud, addressing his misinterpretations with authentic sources, and highlighting the burial of non-Jews like Oskar Schindler, we can better advocate for a society that values individual sovereignty and the free market of ideas.
Further Reading
- Scholarly consensus on "National Socialism" and its political alignment.
- The Mises Institute on "Individualism vs. Collectivism."
- Reports on Stew Peters' rhetoric and its alignment with National Socialist policies.
- The Stew Peters Network's branding and mission statement.
- Authentic Torah and Talmudic texts, such as Leviticus 19:18, Deuteronomy 6:6-7, Exodus 23:4, Tractate Berakhot 8a, Tractate Sanhedrin 59a:4, and other relevant passages.
- Historical records on Oskar Schindler's burial and Jewish burial practices for non-Jews.
- Historical and academic studies debunking forged Talmudic quotes.