Reflections on the topic of photography arise constantly: both during the photography itself, and during the processing and viewing of finished images. And also writing a post is also sometimes spontaneous. You look at the pictures and there are no thoughts...and then something arises and your fingers begin to beat the keyboard by themselves.
I noticed another feature of the perception of reality, which directly depends on the creative wave on which I am at a given moment in time.
Now, if I got stuck on the graphics and I was given a reportage task, then the photos on the assignment will be reportage, but there will be a graphic note in them.
If I hang out on the street, then dark shadows, walking people, color combinations will skip in the report.
You can find graphics almost everywhere.
I find it both in nature and in human-made objects.
In theory, you just need to take a camera and shoot, and not analyze in detail each genre and its perception on the human psyche.
In principle, I do just that - first I shoot, not thinking about anything what affects and how, and only then I try to figure it out.
I'm just interested.
I don't think it makes sense to describe every photographic composition in this post.
After all, they practically do not depend on each other and are independent images.
I also have nothing to say about the stadium, except that there is an interesting track coverage, for the sake of which I came here a second time.
But how a thought appears in a person in order to capture graphic plots, what depends on what, in order to learn how to see this - it's interesting.
Perhaps this is all in order to understand how to do it even better.
Photographers do not always just shoot: someone is interested in equipment, lenses, someone likes to work in a studio with people, someone loves to shoot only the starry sky.
All these inclinations are closely related to parallel hobbies.
And I am fascinated by the knowledge of myself and life. Here it also resonates with photography.