Well, not stating that was the purpose of the post in the post itself, or in the comment of links below it, left the false impression that the views expressed in the post weren't just AI generated, but were your opinion you intended to promulgate. I think that was a failure to provide information fundamental to your purpose, that you only now make clear as a reply to my comment.
I have said I appreciate the depth of research that went into the post, but failing to contextualize or update the research leads to gross misunderstanding, and I expect that to not be repeated. It would have been very easy to include one sentence at the end, or better yet, at the beginning of the post to point out the very different purpose of the post to most blogs, and failing to do that was very misleading.
I hope you do learn from that failure and do not repeat it.
Thanks for clearing up the misunderstanding.
RE: REVERSE ENGINEERING ONLINE MEDIA PROPAGANDA