Honestly, I disagree with much of what you said, mostly because I believe a lot in context. You gave an example about people on hive, and that I can agree with. But the other things you mentioned, I could agree with or disagree with depending on several factors not directly mentioned.
For example, on the subject of expecting media to expect social causes, obviously not every single thing can be represented as you mentioned
But if writers were left to their artistic expression, without the pressures and opinions of those around them, very little would be represented.
In that instance, if representation brings about societal good, should it be sacrificed on the alter artistic expression? My answer isn't yes or no, it will always be "it depends". What is the cause? What degree of effect does the pressure bring?
Ultimately,I couldn't agree with much of the post for that reason, though I do think the supposed reporte was impatient, but it's her money so whatever.
And ironically, I preferred the movies where Bond where Bond killed and womanised without regret, but hey isn't the whole point of a community the exchange of ideas? What point would there be to be on Hive everyone had the same opinion.
I won't be watching the Bond movie anytime soon, but I will be waiting on your next post.
RE: A Good Time to Die