Hello community! This is your mastermind speaking...
Do you want to see that the Pentagon's top-secret documents that were eventually shared on social media will thwart the anticipated and much hyped Ukrainian counteroffensive? After all, the documents that so easily emerged from the empire's infected labyrinths provide the Russians with a wealth of tactical knowledge about the potential directions of the attack.
However, they also draw attention to the insurmountable weaknesses of the Ukrainian armed forces, the ongoing shortage of ammunition, the significant losses of resources, and, ultimately, a Ukraine that is much more worn out than has been suggested so far by Western sources of information and with a much higher number of casualties. Some respond with the typical cognitive insanity, such as the New York Times, which on the one hand says the papers are real but says the number of Ukrainian casualties is fake; it is unclear on what grounds this assertion is inaccurate.
But the evidence that has emerged in two waves, and a third is currently awaited, shows that the USA is actually at war with Russia given that they control all operations, even in minute detail, and that their vast spy network intercepts all communications from allies, including the allied nations Israel, South Korea, Australia, Great Britain, and New Zealand.
In truth, there are several issues with this supposedly top secret material from the Pentagon, and everything seems to have been put together using readily accessible data rather than actual facts.
Everything is presented rather shoddily; for instance, the insistence on re-equipping the Ukrainian air defense with missiles is not backed up by information on the origin of these missiles, and the name of NASAMS, the jointly developed land-based medium-range air defense system by Raytheon, is poorly written. The NATO classification of various military systems reaches a point when errors are made, giving the false appearance that the Alliance is unaware of the precise number and kind of weaponry present in Ukraine.
What does this unlikely non-news leak thus mean? This comes out in my mind: the first is that with this narrative of top-secret documents, information about the actual situation in Ukraine is revealed. As a result, blame on media is lessened and previously unavailable secret material is mentioned. It would be demonstrated by the New York Times' bizarre and schizophrenic stance.
The second is that they very awkwardly have a tendency to mislead the Russians before engaging in an action that is pompously referred to as a counter-offensive while in reality it would be the killing of the last Ukrainian soldiers. The third, this could be an attempt to escape the geopolitical quagmire Washington is being dragged into, is to undermine Putin's support by prolonging a conflict that NATO cannot win in any case but which could also result in an epochal defeat. This option is in some ways an English style escape after previous attempts to destabilize Russia with economic sanctions, which, on the contrary, have destroyed the European allies.
So they act as though they find out from a top-secret paper that the situation in Ukraine is far worse than they thought. Given that the public lacks critical thinking skills, we do not even attempt to explain why the Military did not disclose them to the Washington government.
Yet in summary, we may now start to speculate that the Ukrainian counteroffensive might not have had the disruptive impact that the media's prophets claimed it would, and that it might have almost carried Kiev's 200 tanks all the way to the Pacific. Furthermore, the excuse that the Russians are aware of the preparations might cause the counteroffensive to stall or perhaps fail to start. The fourth thing is that the Pentagon itself released the top-secret documents in order to reveal the true state of Ukraine and prevent the conflict from escalating and possibly going nuclear.
The misuse of military jargon in this situation would have been done to allay concerns about the source. If this were the case, some military officers would view political leaders as untrustworthy, inept, and war mongers. An inversion that wonderfully captures the perplexity of the West.
Don't believe the lies! The truth sets us free! Have a good day !
image from here