The Covid narrative is quickly crumbling, and a number of recent CDC admissions aren’t helping to prop up the shaky ‘pandemic’ that isn’t. Is the agency becoming increasingly honest in the recent weeks or is the narrative simply so weak that the CDC can no longer take part in perpetuating the deception? Either way, the agency is punching holes in the narrative, as the media clings desperately to the pandemic illusion.
In recent updated data on the so-called Covid death count, the CDC revealed that::
For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death.
Only 6% of the official Covid death count being used to fear-monger Americans into submission and perpetuate the pandemic narrative had only ‘Covid-19’ listed as the cause of death on death certificates. And as I recently detailed, although this probably doesn’t mean that only this 6% (about 9,000) of those deaths were ultimately caused by the illness, as ‘Covid19’ is said to directly cause some of the conditions listed as co-morbidities, the data does clearly reveal that a very large percentage of these deaths were caused by other, pre-existing and underlying medical conditions. An exact estimate cannot be made without comparing every individual death certificate to determine how many people had which combination of conditions, but a professional in their field referenced on the Ron Paul Liberty Report estimated probably only about 50,000 of those 160,000 deaths were actually caused by ‘Covid19’:
More discussion on all the details of this story in my recent post linked at the top of the paragraph above.
Forcing the public to wear masks without clear science backing up the efficacy of this practice in stopping spread of viruses has also been a major point of contention, and in an update to its health recommendations, the CDC actually admits that there is no clear evidence for masks. It leaves the relevant admission all the way at the bottom of the guidelines, however, hidden in the appendix.
The relevant statement, found in the clarification in regards to determining ‘close contact,’ says:
While research indicates masks may help those who are infected from spreading the infection, there is less information regarding whether masks offer any protection for a contact exposed to a symptomatic or asymptomatic patient. Therefore, the determination of close contact should be made irrespective of whether the person with COVID-19 or the contact was wearing a mask.
Despite indicating an official stance that masks protect the general public specifically when worn by those who are sick, the CDC then clearly goes on to specifically recommend the public disregard whether or not a “person with COVID-19” was “wearing a mask” in determining potential exposure to the ‘virus’. This clearly indicates a knowledge or belief on their part that masks don’t work, even when worn by the sick, or at least they don’t have enough evidence backing this theory up to be able to trust masks enough to come into close contact with a ‘Covid19’ patient and not be at risk of contracting the virus oneself.
Also at the core of the argument behind mandatory masks and the push for masks-for-all is the notion that ‘asymptomatic carriers’ of the virus are at a high risk of spreading it, despite a WHO doctor admitting the evidence they had from studies actually suggested the opposite - that ‘asymptomatic carriers’ were generally not contagious.
Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove explaining, in June:
"From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual."
"We have a number of reports from countries who are doing very detailed contact tracing. They’re following asymptomatic cases. They’re following contacts. And they’re not finding secondary transmission onward. It’s very rare.”
Now, in a recent guideline update, the CDC has shifted its own official recommendations to align with this understanding. The new CDC guidelines state:
If you have been in close contact (within 6 feet) of a person with a COVID-19 infection for at least 15 minutes but do not have symptoms: You do not necessarily need a test unless you are a vulnerable individual or your health care provider or State or local public health officials recommend you take one.
This is a sharp contrast to previous guidelines:
Testing is recommended for all close contacts of persons with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Because of the potential for asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic transmission, it is important that contacts of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection be quickly identified and tested.
Interestingly, on a mask related note, the CDC in updated guidance also recently warned that store employees attempting to enforce mask mandates “should not argue with anti-maskers,” the Hill reported.
Even a professional in his field featured on a BBC interview was warning that: “There’s very little evidence for the use of masks in schools."
SAGE member Professor Russell Viner tells the BBC host that children “could potentially spread the virus more” if they wear masks. And if this is the case with children, how would it possibly not be the case with adults as well? If there is “little evidence for masks in schools,” what that means is that there is little evidence for masks in general.
Meanwhile the CDC has also recently dropped its 14-day quarantine recommendation for travelers, almost as if it recognizes how ineffective quarantines for the healthy really are at stopping the spread of this so-called virus. This update also aligns with the data indicating those who are not sick (‘asymptomatic’) are not at risk of spreading the ‘virus.’
But even that’s not quite all. Hidden away in the CDC instruction manual (“Instructions for Use”) for the ‘Covid19’ RT-PCR tests published on the FDA website, the agency admits the ‘virus’ has in fact never been isolated (purified), which for those who are not familiar, means this so-called novel coronavirus has not been properly identified and proven to exist as such by the only existing scientific gold standard of virus identification.
“...no quantified virus isolate of the 2019 nCov are currently available,” the CDC document reads, under the Analytical Performance section of the test instructions.
The detailed Off Guardian expose on this subject goes into great depth documenting the significance of this, and how totally “scientifically meaningless” these PCR tests - being widely relied upon by the mainstream media for their fear-mongering scamdemic numbers - really are.
Some of the doctors speaking about about the virus isolation issue and lack of science behind the coronavirus claims, exposing the scamdemic for what it truly is, are Dr. Andrew Kaufman and Dr. Mohammed Iqbal Adil, two examples of doctors I have previously covered suggesting the entire thing is a massive hoax.
This entire ‘pandemic’ is based on blind faith, not facts and science. Now, even within the faulty pandemic paradigm, the mainstream narrative continues to crumble. How long will the establishment be able to continue desperately clinging to the ridiculous pandemic narrative before the whole country wakes up to the truth, that Americans have all been deceived and enslaved by the largest scam the world has ever known, the global scamdemic known as Covid-19(84)?
