(source)
The march to mandatory vaccination continues as the first Covid19 vaccines reach the approval stage, with recent announcements indicating an "immunization passport" will in many cases be required to travel internationally, one Congressman's stimulus plan aimed at making issuance of the next stimulus check dependent upon the person's willingness to be vaccinated, withholding stimulus checks from anyone who opts out of receiving one of the new experimental Covid19 vaccines, and the recent announcement that all coronavirus vaccine recipients will be issued a physical vaccination card (which could potentially be used as one form of 'proof of vaccination' when businesses begin requiring proof of vaccination for their services). I cover these and more developments on this front in my most recent video, linked below:
As I and many others have been warning for months now, the coming rollout of the new 'mandatory' Covid19 vaccine will not likely be mandated by laws and orders for the most part, but rather by societal pressure, with large corporate chains and other businesses requiring proof of vaccination for use of their services, and employers requiring the same as a condition of employment, much like what has become widely commonplace across the entire country and much of the world in regards to 'mandatory' masks and other 'pandemic' guidelines. Where masks are not mandated at the local, state or federal level, they are still 'required' to do business in many stores, to travel (on an airline, bus or train), and as a condition of employment in all big corporate chains that I know of and a good number of small businesses as well.
This idea of quasi-mandatory vaccines being enforced at the corporate and societal level rather than directly by the government, and being widely required for many basic societal functions is not merely the crazy conspiracy theory of a few lone paranoid nutcases, but is actually the ideal future as seen by various so-called 'experts', widely reported by mainstream media over the summer. For example, from The National Geographic in August:
This is the future as some experts see it: a world in which you’ll need to show you’ve been inoculated against the novel coronavirus to attend a sports game, get a manicure, go to work, or hop on a train.
Bill Gates also predicted all the way back in April (or maybe even March) that immunization passports or vaccine certificates of some kind would be required to travel once the new vaccines become widely available.
Now, even before any of the new vaccines receive approval, one airline has already made vaccination a requirement for future travel. "Now that a COVID-19 vaccine is finally in sight, governments, employers, schools, and service providers are debating whether or not to mandate compulsory jabs," Grady McGregor writes for Fortune. "One airline carrier is taking a stand on the matter."
Last Thursday, Alan Joyce, the CEO of Australia's Qantas Airways, "said that Qantas will require passengers to prove that they’ve been vaccinated for COVID-19 in order to board international flights."
"Australia’s success at virtually eliminating COVID means we’ll need a vaccine for international travel to restart properly," Joyce said on a call with investors on Thursday. "We have a duty of care to our people and to our passengers, and once a safe and effective vaccine becomes readily available, it will be a requirement."
Meanwhile just three days later on December 7, ABS-CBN News reported that: "COVID-19 "passports" to show peoples' inoculation and infection history will be "essential" when the Philippines opens up international travel, the head of the country's largest budget carrier said Monday."
"We do think that’s essential, especially as we open up international travel. Ang dami-daming (there are many) different vaccines and I think we have to work on a single, global COVID passport so that each country respects the passport," he told reporters.
The idea for "immunity passports" isn't new, and in mid November an Axios report indicated that the digital passes already in use to some degree, that were developed by Big Tech for this purpose, could be a model for airlines. The title reads: "Ticketmaster's digital health pass to battle coronavirus could be a model for airlines."
"Ticketmaster's plan to ensure fan safety using a smartphone app could point to the future of air travel," Axios reported.
What's happening: Three global alliances representing 58 airlines are pushing governments to allow widespread COVID-19 testing of passengers instead of existing quarantine restrictions that they argue are ineffective and have killed travel demand.
- Oneworld, Star Alliance and SkyTeam cited recent tests of the CommonPass digital health passport system, a nonprofit initiative backed by the World Economic Forum and Swiss-based foundation The Commons Project.
- United Airlines is among the carriers that piloted the technology.
Ticketmaster's plan to require a digital health pass for concertgoers might be a model for airlines.
A digital passport that will serve as proof of immunity, a digital vaccine certificate, will likely be required in many cases to travel, find or maintain employment, dine out, go to a ball game, and possibly even to pick up groceries at your local Supermarket, or just to qualify to receive a stimulus check.
It's so easy to see that this form of a 'mandatory' vaccination program enforced by corporate America based upon digital vaccine certificates is not only the plan and has been from the very beginning, but is also right on the verge of being implemented, if you just look at what the programmers are telling us in their headlines and listen to what the 'experts' are saying about the future.
This has always been the plan from the beginning, they've been telling us to expect mandatory vaccination and vaccine certificates since the arrival of this so-called pandemic. Just look at a few of the headlines on the issue, and listen to the 'experts' like Bill Gates who have been saying this day was coming, and it's clear this will be the future if things go according to plan for those rolling out this technocratic "Great Reset" agenda.
It's all clearly laid out in an article published by Today on December 8, how Big Tech ("tech firms") have been busy "developing" the apps that can "create" immunity certificates or passports, that are all ready for use by "Airlines and other companies [that] are interested in apps that could allow their customers to enter and store immunization information":
One former congressman is so intent on 'motivating' (forcing) the vaccine on a population that is otherwise extremely hesitant about or even in staunch opposition of doing so, that his plan for the likely coming stimulus package would make the proposed $1500 stimulus payment dependent upon the person's willingness to receive the vaccine. Withholding much needed funds from those who are in poverty directly caused by government policies actions, unless they 'choose' to take the vaccine, doesn't exactly leave very much of a real choice, nor is it ethical behavior.
Public polling has found that whether or not to take the vaccine has become a political issue, which is discouraging, Delaney said.
“We have to create, in my judgment, an incentive for people to really accelerate their thinking about taking the vaccine,” Delaney said.
To be sure, those who are not comfortable receiving the vaccine would not be forced to do so.
“If you’re still afraid of the vaccine and don’t want to take it, that’s your right,” Delaney said. “You won’t participate in this program.”
If you don't wanna take the vaccine, it won't be 'forced' upon you, you just won't be able to participate in the program to give each American $1500 in financial relief to ease the economic hardship caused by the widespread government-imposed lockdowns. No problem, just a really big "incentive" to cooperate with the plan to force at least 75% of the American population to get vaccinated with one of the numerous new experimental Covid19 vaccines that will soon be hitting the market, but by no means threatening behavior meant to 'force' vaccination upon an unwilling population...
As to the coming vaccine(s) actually being deemed "safe," it is worth noting that even the FDA has admitted that up to 4.6% of the Pfizer vaccine trial participants had experienced "severe adverse reactions".
Severe adverse reactions occurred in 0.0-4.6% of participants, were more frequent after Dose 2 than after Dose 1 and were generally less frequent in older adults (>55 years of age) (<2.8%) as compared to younger participants (≤4.6%). Among reported unsolicited adverse events, lymphadenopathy occurred much more frequently in the vaccine group than the placebo group and is plausibly related to vaccination.
The FDA also announced that two Pfizer vaccine trial participants had died during trials, bringing the total number of vaccine participants who have died during or immediately following their participation in Covid19 vaccine trials globally to at least five. One of the deaths was a priest in Philadelphia who participated in the Moderna trial, one was a Cinovax vaccine trial participant who died in Brazil, and another Brazilian participant died during a trial of the AstraZeneca vaccine some time ago.
How truly "safe and effective" any of these vaccines will be won't fully be known for years, which is why all recipients will be closely monitored for 24 months following their inoculation as part of a "pharmacovigilance surveillance" program used to test the long-term safety of these new experimental vaccines, which can't yet be known because some serious adverse side affects don't surface for many months or even years after initial vaccination. What I am certain of, however, is that it is each and every individual's basic human right to decide whether or not they feel these new vaccines are safe and effective for themselves, whether or not they feel the potential benefits of the vaccine outweighs the potential harm, and ultimately whether or not they choose to be vaccinated or not. This is why the method of 'forcing' vaccination without government mandates is so popular now and being used first, because it can be argued by its sponsors that there technically isn't any vaccine being "mandated" and therefore nobody's rights are being violated. Because there is more than one way to force a population to be vaccinated, and the method now being implemented is being implemented for the very reason that it is effective. They know it's effective because of just exactly how effective the same type of mask requirements have been at coercing populations to wear a mask in many cases without a government mandate.
Our Covid1984 'new normal' continues to arrive, one step at a time, right on schedule, just as predicted. And remember, the vaccines are coming to save the day, "but first, a long dark winter."
Bitcoin Donations: 3NvDtqUYrT7SuRFF6J21kquaaXSTs1iosB
Support my work & spread the message of peace with a T-shirt at the same time: https://teespring.com/stores/peace-products