So, I made 5 bad choices regarding the 30 witnesses I voted on? So, out of 100%, my score is roughly 85% or like a B grade. So, who do I replace those 5 votes on?
So, these 5 accounts I voted for I assume are supporting other accounts who have downvote trails? My position is the automatic flagging downvote trails are dangerous and I would discourage people away from them. I can imagine justification, excuses. I understand the theory of trying to reduce spam and such. That might be a theory behind the rationalization of downvote trails. My position is that it is probably better, generally speaking, to simply upvote what you like and ignore what you don't. I think I would disagree with the philosophy of downvote trails in general. I am not going to say exceptions to that general rule does not exist. But normalizing downvote trails is a psychological slippery slope down the wrong path.
But what if a particular witness is doing many good things and is supporting downvote trails or other things? Where do you draw the line in who you want to support for witnesses? Is there no amount of good deeds that can take some of them off your naughty list and back on your good list, Mr. Logic Zombie Santa Claus?
RE: STOP VOTING FOR HIVE OLIGARCHY - START VOTING FOR FREE-SPEECH