My question is not about what they argue but about where you draw the line and who do you vote for or who might be in your top 30 or top 50. I am not going to not vote for a witness. However, I will simply vote for people meaning I can end up replacing some of them simply because I had better options, better picks. So, I vote for people who start projects like the Hive Vote for example which I like. Anything that is interesting. People behind PeakD, Ecency, 3Speak, Hive Blocks, Hive Blog the website app part, and maybe even Leo Finance. If I can come up with 30 witnesses, accounts, connected to whichever might be my favorite projects, etc, that would be how I go about who I vote for and who I don't vote for.
I try not to think too much about who not to vote for. I guess if somebody was too bad like Hitler, then you would probably put Hitler or Stalin or Mao or Lenin or Rothschild or Soros or Bill Gates towards the back of the list. But then there might be a potential of voting for some people at the end of the top 30.
And there might be some overlap between things I like about a witness and things I don't. So, for example, if my top pick was the man behind Hive Vote, imagine finding that guy connected to downvote trails or other things. I could see a hypothetical situation where some downvote trails could be discouraging spam or other things. I am still against downvoting in general for many reasons. But I can see it working as much as hypothetical communism working. And communism does not work. I am against communism and downvote. But I can see some rare exceptions to the rules where it might work.
And then I ponder if a witness is divided between doing good things and doing bad things, then where do you draw the line? And do you support Leo Finance? Which projects, apps, websites, etc, are your favorite? What are your top 30 or 50 witness picks?
RE: STOP VOTING FOR HIVE OLIGARCHY - START VOTING FOR FREE-SPEECH