This past year has pushed Internet censorship to new heights never before seen. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and John Hopkins University sponsored Event 201 was a drill on how to deal with the next allegedly inevitable pandemic. One could argue this was a pretest for the plans to come, or even the kick starter event to make sure everyone knew what to do for what was coming.
One of the focal points was the suppression of alleged misinformation. This is any information that does not align with the positions of government and so-called health experts and what they want the public to believe about an alleged pandemic.They are doing a great job at achieving the goal to suppress any information they don't want people to be exposed to.
The blue-check fact-checkers are out in full force trying to disqualify much valid information. But anything that is demonstrably false and put out by the authoritative sources of government or approved health experts is never put into question. One example of this is a Facebook post from the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS).
A message they had posted for public consumption stated "on the journey to FDA approval, each COVID-19 vaccine had to pass through the same thresholds of research & testing as every other vaccine," as well as "all three of the approved COVID-19 vaccines were proven to be safe and 100% effective in preventing hospitalization and death in the clinical trials."
But this isn't true. The FDA never approved any experimental injection, otherwise referred to as a vaccine. Three of these injections are authorized by the FDA for an emergency use, what is known as an EUA. Even the FDA authorization letters [1, 2] state each is "an investigational vaccine not licensed for any indication" and require that "promotional material relating to the COVID-19 Vaccine clearly and conspicuously … state that this product has not been approved or licensed by the FDA"
The Facebook statement is further false as none of these experimental injections have passed through the same thresholds of research and testing as every other vaccine. The FDA factsheets state [1, 2] that these 'vaccines' "ha[ve] not undergone the same type of review as an FDA-approved or cleared product."
Lastly, they have not been proven "100% effective in preventing hospitalization and death". The FDA makes clear: “A larger number of individuals at high risk of COVID-19 and higher attack rates would be needed to confirm efficacy of the vaccine against mortality.” Additionally, the FDA’s Review Memorandum for Moderna’s vaccine states: “There were no deaths due to COVID-19 at the time of the interim analysis to enable an assessment of vaccine efficacy against death due to COVID-19.”
ICAN has written letters via their attorneys to ensure this false information is removed, because they care about keeping people informed and allowing them to make informed decisions that they consent to. But the MDHHS only changed what they stated, which is still stating things that are untrue:
The FDA has stated this is not the case: "Based on the safety and effectiveness data, and review of manufacturing information regarding product quality and consistency, it is reasonable to believe that Moderna COVID'19 Vaccine may be effective. Additionally, it is reasonable to conclude, based on the totality of the scientific evidence available, that the known and potential benefits of Moderna COVID'19 Vaccine outweigh the known and potential risks of the vaccine, for the prevention of COVID-19 in individuals 18 years of age and older."
This is the level of integrity and knowledge that government institutions and their so-called health experts have to properly inform the public about these experimental injections. Everyone needs to do their own research and think for themselves rather than simply believe what the authorities tell them to believe.