Source
Hiding In Plain Sight
“The masses have never thirsted after truth. They turn aside from evidence that is not to their taste, preferring to deify error, if error seduces them. Whoever can supply them with illusions is easily their master; whoever attempts to destroy their illusions is always their victim. An individual in a crowd is a grain of sand amid other grains of sand, which the wind stirs up at will.”― Gustave Le Bon
Over numerous posts with literally thousands of reference points, personally researched quotes, official documents, and funding inter-connections, I have displayed that the vast majority of fake grassroots environment, youth, and social movements, all connect to the same control structure. Ever growing in power and influence we are witnessing the insidious birth of a scientifically refined, propaganda-driven, financial, ideological, and perceptual control mechanism, one that is fracturing a socially engineered state of division and confrontation.
The sheer scale of this corruption, manipulation, and malfeasance, enables the agenda to hide in plain sight. Indeed, both this post and all the posts I have listed at its end, form a singular, vast, interconnected, interlinked article that will eventually bind all parts into a cohesive whole. Every unreferenced point of fact that I make in this article is already cross-referenced, linked, and sourced within the other parts. All aspects feed into a singular narrative, each interwoven fragment adding further detail and veritas to a tapestry of totalitarianism.
Today, I will attempt to display how all these identity labels, ideologies, and movements, intersect under the banner of what is termed authoritarian communitarianism. As always it is important to point out that I am relaying an intent, methodology, strategy, and infrastructure, I am not defining our future, for that is ours to lose.
Source
Authoritarian Communitarianism
Authoritarian communitarianism could be explained as a multi-faceted all-encompassing (hence very difficult to define) philosophy/strategy that seeks to merge and usurp individual and and national rights, with the "greater good" of the global community. Global governance shapes the community, and the community molds the global citizen. Governed by the belief that every individual right carries both a duty and responsibility to (what will become) an increasing array of communitarian principles, rules, regulations, journalistic, and behavioural practices.
The parasitic nature of communitarianism weaves a thread through and feeds from every political ideology, philosophy, and religion, slowly drawing them all into a singular umbrella of control. Identity and sexuality are seen as the epitome of freedom, all identities are interconnected by the same principles of governance and all emotions are catered for. As long as you consent to the top down global to local values and principles, everyone is appeased with a voice, but never loud enough to enact change in matters of tangible consequence.
On the surface, the broader communitarian philosophy will initially be perceived as fairly innocuous, and as with all schools of thought, there is a sliding scale of intention. Of course, it’s true that if you live within a community then we have a certain degree of responsibility towards the environment in which we live and the people we interact with. That said, we should not confuse authoritarian communitarianism with preconceived notions of a cohesive neighbourhood, in reality, it is the individual, local, and national face of global governance.
We are looking at a system that has reverse-engineered the psychology and hardwiring of our social and community bonds, and are utilising them as a tool of control. In essence, communitarian governance is the scientific manipulation of the community and our tribal heritage. A parasite class imposed collectivism and a contrived interdependence that impedes choice and freedom whilst insidiously segregating/vilifying/ostracising all opposition.
From a social control perspective, we can also connect said philosophy to the Tavistock method I have discussed in previous posts; "harnessing the methodology of peer pressure as a means of convincing the individual/country to relinquish firmly held beliefs and freedoms". Nudging us towards the socially engineered voluntary surrender of free will, independence, and unalienable rights, at the altar of the one-world community.
Once you understand this template, we can comprehend how this is occurring on both the micro (individual) and the macro (nation-state) level. On the world stage, we are witnessing the rise of a regulatory dictatorship whose intent is to invalidate the volition of the country in favour of increasingly dogmatic environmental mandates, obligations, regulations, land and resource management decrees. Layers of interwoven (oft invisible) governance that binds the objectives of the one world order. Global rights overturn national identity, and the facade of government is quietly usurped by the mandates of one-world governance.
Whilst we can become blinded by the extremes, if you look close enough you can observe that the devil is in the detail.
The Illusion Of Choice
In cyberspace, on both the individual and collective/website level, those that attempt to swim against the cognitive undercurrents of the narrative, increasingly find themselves at the mercy of communitarian dogmas that supplant free expression. You could find yourself vilified, de-platformed, demonetised, and experience real-world consequences like job loss, or a tarnished reputation.
In respect of a website, you may fail to meet the community standards of Paypal and no longer be able to process your payments, your site host might be targetted or eventually find themselves at the mercy of extra layers of bureaucratic governance. Gradually your ability to exist as a singular self-contained entity will become increasingly difficult.
All of this can occur outside of the law of the land but within the law of the community. Indeed, in many ways, communitarian law is the intangible and indiscernible implementation of the intended one-world law system. The web existing as an observable mirror image of the method. Slowly but surely drawing every aspect of the net into an singular stranglehold of control.
At the local community and planning level, when they are unable to control via the consensus they cultivate the illusion of one. We can observe this process with the creation of the citizen's assemblies (which supersede local community hubs) I have covered in a previous post. Among others, here in the UK, these assemblies are run by an organisation called involve.org, which has funding connections to the Open Society Foundation & Googles Deepmind.
Through the utilisation of global change agents infused with narrative control methodologies like the Delphi technique, and sympathetic locals as their board members, they manufacture the illusion of choice. Stifling the voices of the opposing loud minority, by cultivating the perception that they're speaking for the silent majority. Each reciprocal corporate community gradually becoming akin to links in the chains that bind us.
Source
Nobody Left Behind
As I have documented within numerous posts; the United Nations/corporate-led sustainable (Agenda 2030) development goals are a key macro communitarian construct that draws each country (and individual) into a singular narrative. A world encircled with so much red tape that it becomes a noose around the necks of small business and the common man.
Land & habitation restrictions, planning, environmental sanctions, legislated codes of ethics, business practices, privatisation of resources, property rights, a worldwide common core education system, the corporate takeover of food production, centralised resource management, travel restrictions, global health & medical surveillance, health passports, a biometric blockchain, digital currency, energy quotas, surrender of privacy for a perceived greater good, a trackable digital I.D, human settlement clearances, high-density housing/smart cities, and the surrender of resources/land/oceans (oft undermining the heritage of indigenous communities) to a centralised planetary bureaucracy, are each aspects of communitarian governance.
Of course in the age of the inversion, the “common good” actually relates to what is good for the one world order, not the individual, the community, nor the nation-state. In many ways, the UN communitarian buzzwords exist as real-world manifestations of Orwell's doublespeak.
Sustainable = The control over every facet of your lives.
Inclusive = Hive mind of accepted opinion.
Transformation = Social engineering.
Selfish = Individuality.
Nobody left behind = No choice.
Vibrant community = A homoginised society.
Harmonious = An ever expanding array of forbidden questions.
Throughout my work I have taken a great deal of time to display and reference how all of these seemingly unconnected progressive strides forward all connect to the same control structure. This is the true face of global governance and it is occurring in plain sight; a global coup concealed behind the veil of environmentalism and engineered in such a manner that the will of the consensus demands it.
Source
Communitarian Individuality
In every facet of our lives, the globally mandated, locally dictated, and socially equated, communitarian control structure will be used as a means to infringe upon and redefine our individual rights.
Civil liberties and individuality will be held hostage to an ever-expanding myriad of top-down community enforced global to local dogmas. The manipulation of group psychology being the fuel that drives the engine of social governance. Staying withthat statement, within this 98 page UK government document from 2010 (titled Mind Space), we find the cabinet office discussing how applied psychology (mind control) is used to influence societal behavioural change.
The fallout from Covid-19 gifts the opportunity to observe that we're looking at a social ordinance that uses the sequential tidal wave of the consensus to carry the individual toward a predetermined destination. The curtain twitching global citizens the prison guards, the non - compliant the prisoners of their projected fears. Here we can observe that psychiatrists are now linking noncompliance the “new (ab) normal” with “dark personality” traits including narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy.
Make no mistake, whatever your thoughts on our brave new normal, from a psychological perspective, we are witnessing a global compliance test of epic proportions and far-reaching implications.
The nature of social cohesion dictates that the majority will be happy to make these individual sacrifices for a perceived greater good. The guardians of the consensus vilifying and collectivising all that refuse to live in a state of media-fueled fear. Still, I wonder how many will pause to consider the evolution of the method? Neglect to follow the trend to its intended conclusion. Remaining unaware that we have embarked on a psychological induction whose scope and ambition exists beyond the crisis of the moment, and behind the smoke and mirrors of public awareness.
The Socially Engineered Media Community
Authoritarian Communitarianism is about the collectivisation and weaponisation of polarised identities. Now speech and debate have been drawn into the digital forums of cyberspace, they can then become controlled by the platform's “community standards”. The tech giants can then repudiate real-world definitions of free expression, selectively enforcing restrictions in favour of a socially engineered consensus. Identitarian politics enable the creation of an impenetrable wall of political correctness and hate speech re-definitions that restrain debate and discussion.
At the polarity of the safe space dystopia, the opposition often voices their dissatisfaction by becoming increasingly overt, abusive, and confrontational. In this instance, we can observe a self-perpetuating devolution of dialogue, one that fans the flames of speech restrictions and enables materially tangible life implications. A process that is evolving towards the real-world subconscious social engineering of language, accepted talking points, and opinions.
The minds of the middle man are increasingly held captive, the structured and manufactured false dichotomies of warring polarities akin to the bars in a perceptual prison. A shrinking Overton window, and a creeping intellectual no man's land where the majority feel unable to step too far beyond a perceived consensus.
In the prequel to this post, I extensively covered the methodologies and documented the corporate intelligence (behavioral change) apparatus behind the narrative controllers and provocateurs of social media. Today I also want to briefly note the presence of the Israeli & US military-inspired British armies 77th Brigade. If you're swimming against the current narrative and spending time arguing on social media, chances are you've encountered similar operatives.
The British army is creating a special force of Facebook warriors, skilled in psychological operations and use of social media to engage in unconventional warfare in the information age. The 77th Brigade, to be based in Hermitage, near Newbury, in Berkshire, will be about 1,500-strong and formed of units drawn from across the army. It will formally come into being in April. The brigade will be responsible for what is described as non-lethal warfare. Both the Israeli and US army already engage heavily in psychological operations. Against a background of 24-hour news, smartphones and social media, such as Facebook and Twitter, the force will attempt to control the narrative. Source
Source
The Communitarian Synthesis
The communitarian philosophy is the one world order, and the extremity of political polarity is an integral component behind its realisation. The incrementally insidious politicisation of every event, crisis, movement, social identity, and ideology, is a key driving force toward the intended endgame. Right-wing crony capitalism is the thesis, whilst left-wing Marxism/socialism is the antithesis; both are utilised as a means to push us towards the one world (third way) synthesis.
In truth, neither the capitalist nor the socialist will achieve the political nirvana that they strive for; in essence, they are both (unknowingly) pawns that are fighting for the birth of the one world order. Every movement and every political ideology are both directly, and indirectly steering us towards the same predetermined destination. The political idealist failing to comprehend that every infiltrated ism is a control mechanism that is aiding the formation of the one world perceptual prison.
As we move towards the synthesis of the Hegelian dialectic, the truth obscures itself beneath a cloak of ideologically subjective interpretations. How many are prepared to cast aside the shackles of everything they hold to be true? All they’ve allowed to define them? Have you noticed how nobody is wrong anymore? How we already exist within a dia-tribal dialectical twilight zone, a phantasmic illusionary halfway house between freedom and slavery, individuality and collectivism, crony capitalism and national socialism?
The Final Dialectic War
Whilst many aspects of the communitarian system are being quietly maneuvered into place. To realise the totality of its intended ambition its overt manifestation will be born from the fires of confrontation. The world needs to reach a point of such abject chaos, overt corruption, demoralisation, and wholesale confusion, that the premeditated synthesis will be embraced as an entirely logical choice, a scientifically refined final solution. Communitarianism is intended to be grasped as the saviour of humanity, the phoenix that will rise from the ashes of disorder.
As division fractures, the polarities of every opposing spectrum become embroiled within a perverse symbiotic relationship, each side feeding off the other and driving us towards the chaotic crescendo of a premeditated conclusion.
Over the next few years/decade; the spiraling danse macabre of the dialectical delusion will play out on the social level I discuss herein, law & order, food distribution, the financial markets, and potentially the socially catalysing/metamorphosing theater of war. As it ebbs and flows, the only constant will be the encroaching technological control grid that is being quietly assembled in the background.
The one world disorder rising from an insidiously manipulated multifarious array of social schisms, enabled through an age of algorithmically induced ideological extremism, and leading towards a new era of technocratic feudalism. As the chaotic clash of polarised and confrontational idealisms cultivate social tribalism, the order of global communitarianism will be welcomed as an entirely logical synergism. Alas, few will comprehend that they have voluntarily embraced a socially engineered state of a brave new totalitarianism.
Basic Language & Memetic Warfare
So how did we get here? Increasingly we live in an era that casts aside the validity of nuance in favour of polarised, heavily politicised, pre-programmed, emotionally reactive knee-jerk responses that dance to the tune of the perceptual pied pipers. An ever-decreasing spiral of one-size-fits-all insults and ad hominem attacks. Misplaced and ill-founded words now heralding the power to destroy careers and reputations. Trust, memetic warfare is far more nuanced than the memes it is associated with.
The devolution of free speech and debate has its seeds in the fertile soils of the Tavistock Institute. Using the work of British linguist C.K. Ogden as its foundation; throughout the 2nd World War, operatives like Tavistock founder member Brigadier General John Rawling Rees were working on a secret project that sought to deconstruct the complexities of the English language and reconstruct a communicative method that was termed basic English, Basic for short.
Under the direction of then Prime Minister Winston Churchill the Basic project was expanded into the United States. Whilst the public was initially resistant to such change, the concept was eventually repackaged with elements being used as a means to simplify mainstream media and news broadcasts. Gone were the descriptive formats of yesteryear, born were the simplistic vocabulary, simplified formations, and shortened sentence structures that exist to this day. Increasingly we can observe this devolution within pop culture and the mainstream “he said” "she said” emotionally reactive identitarian theatrics of political pantomime.
In essence I have come to believe that the creeping evolution of Basic has now birthed a form of algorithmic perceptual control, intended to inhibit the maturation of nuance and critical thinking. We could consider Basic as a tool of language limitation that restrains free expression, bridles forbidden questions, and enables the manipulation of meaning through metaphor. Trapping individuals within the emotional wastelands of their downloaded collective subjective unrealities.
Source
Over the years this perceptual control mechanism has devolved towards the infiltration of dialogue and the policing of language, both of which are aspects of memetic warfare. Consider externally created internally equated slogans, logos, and the mind virus of implanted narratives, simplistic (subconsciously absorbed) denigration that replaces intellectual debate. A culture of downloaded talking points and self-definitions that are handed down for us to divide ourselves with and argue over. Pause to consider where these collective insults, topics, and emotionally reactive words of the moment come from? Observe how they infiltrate, manipulate, define, and fracture the social order.
We have been sleepwalked into cultural cul-de-sac by a cancel cult-ure that has lost the ability to self-reflect. Large swathes of the public portray an inability to think beyond and question the fallacies within their externally downloaded identities, ideologies, and socially engineered worldviews. This is the age of the pseudo consensus, a repetitive, narcissistic, morally relativistic, emotionally opportunistic, echo chamber reverberating, fragile mind-state manipulating, pseudo-intellectual straight jacket for the mind.
Source
Will Of The People?
Desperately clawing for recognition among the wastelands of their self-imposed mediocrity. By their words you shall know them, no originality, cardboard cut-out talking points, vacuous one-size-fits-all labels, reactive mindsets, downloaded mantras that are devoid of creativity, no free thinkers, no nuance, and the silencing of all that oppose their collective nonsensical sense and sensibilities.
CRIMESTOP. CRIMESTOP means the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. CRIMESTOP, in short, means protective stupidity... orthodoxy in the full sense demands a control over one's own mental processes as complete as that of a contortionist over his body. George Orwell 1984
Because everyone knows that if you disagree with a talking point or fail to bend a knee to BLM you must be a white supremacist, or far-right, or a Nazi, erm, right?? Certainly, pseudo-intellectualism, narcissism, and virtue signaling now masquerade as a divisive self-proclaimed moral high ground.
We are witnessing the tentative first steps of the global citizen, a social control mechanism that is (in essence) a new form of collective social governance. Within multiple areas of societal reformation, the socially engineered will of the consensus ensures that what the people are led to think they want, they will inevitably get. This methodology is predominantly focused upon youth activism, hence with each passing year, it creates a self-perpetuating snowball effect that gathers momentum.
Throughout its opening stages communitarian activism will often deliver socially favourable results, evolving to the point where the people themselves will become the totalitarians and enforcers of the new social paradigm. We can already observe the formation of this process within the cancel culture and twitter meltdowns of cyberspace.
In many ways we are abstractly observing the social implementation of communitarian law. At the public level, this aspect of the law system uses our manipulated emotions and desire for social justice to undermine the rule of law and freedom of expression. Psychologically switching between our worst virtues and weaponising our best. Gradually people are becoming lost within a mind maze of emotionally reactive autocues and filtered interpretations, exploited emotional states utilised as a force of premeditated change. Manipulation will masquerade as choice, and self-determinism as an oppression of the masses.
Certainly, emotions are far easier to manipulate than facts, thus one day the will of the mob mind will be directed upon all that oppose the march of the one world order.
Source
Divide & Conquer
As the algorithmic echo chambers of social media nudge people towards the extremes of their opposing political and social doctrines. We can observe how the entire left/right mind control paradigm has become increasingly weaponised, the allure of a false dichotomy leading people towards a path of confrontation from which the system can cultivate a justified state of subjugation.
Our highly contentious political overlords are becoming increasingly symbolic, manifesting as subjective interpretations of hope or repression. The divisive character of Trump now exists as a symbol of patriotism and capitalism, his every word rallying the nationalist/capitalist thesis, fuelling the required globalist/socialist antithesis, cultivating anger, and chipping away at the crumbling foundations of our social pillars.
The fake youth, corporate environment, the heavily politicised and subverted civil rights, anti-fascist, and anti-globalist movements, are in essence, the globalist-funded anti-globalists. The globalists fund the politically indoctrinated grassroots activists, who equate capitalism with globalism and thus believe they’re anti-globalists. Through propaganda, emotional manipulation, social engineering, and co-opted funding mechanisms, the communitarian anti-globalists unknowingly demand globalist policies as an act of rebellion.
Source
The left thinks it’s a far-right uprising and the right a communist revolution, few will comprehend that they’re both wrong. There will be no winners in this game of thrones, we are being led towards an eventual merger of ideologies, order out of an instigated state of chaos. The corrupt decaying carcass of the old system providing the friction of an opposing force, inflaming its antithesis and as a means of igniting the intended one-world synthesis. Drawing us ever closer to a socially engineered revolution that will use the manipulated will of a divided populace to enable the formation of the one world Ordo ab Chao.
The extremities of the far-left & far-right, racist & anti-racist, industry & environment, chaos & order, poverty & wealth, and war & peace, are the perceptual bookends that are being used to restructure the environment and socially engineer the perceptions of the middle man. Hidden within the contradictions of the inversion, the truth obscures itself within the perceived moral and intellectual high ground.
At the extremities of their opposing polarities the fascists and the anti-fascists are both increasingly fascistic, the racist and the anti-racist are both racists. Whilst the promise of peace (the hive mind) is used as the justification to conduct a war on the minds of men, environmentalism is usurped by corporations, and chaos will usher in a new era of totalitarian peace. Within this comprehension, we can discern that the extremities of each opposing ideology reveal the true nature of the authoritarian's psychology, and thus the intended inversion of our social morphology.
Source
Good Cop Bad Cop
By relinquishing the chains of the political and ideological prison we can begin to grasp the psychological nature of our perceptual schism. Obscured behind the denigrations of far-right and wokism, we can also consider how the opposing symbols of Obama & Trump are potentially, a carefully, deliberately crafted means to a divisive and confrontational end. Whether you perceive this to be a capitalisation or a long-term psychological operation, the result (divide & conquer) would appear to be the same.
Certainly, from a psychological warfare perspective, the hugely divisive nature of their opposing symbologies has not gone unnoticed, Obama = thesis, Trump = antithesis, Obama & Trump = aiding the synthesis of confrontation. When Obama is in office he hosts BLM at the White House and when Trump is in office, they storm it!
The consensus of the left ignored the duplicity of Obama, the right the fallacies of Trump. Welcome to the subjective mind game of communitarian law. Such is the hatred that has been cultivated towards Trump and the right-wing you can now manipulate by telling the truth. By attaching elements of the truth to Trump and the increasingly blurring boundaries of the right/alt-right/far-right we have a knee jerk emotionally reactive left that will gravitate towards the polarity (without a semblance of research) of any right-wing announcement.
If Trump bashes the UN or defunds (whilst giving further funding to Gavi & fast-tracking a militarised vaccine rollout) the WHO, the liberal progressive and pseudo-intellectual mindstate will gravitate towards it. The right wants to lift lockdown restrictions to open the economy, thus the mind game dictates that the left-wing press (and their political adherents) demand that we remain locked down. They've even turned medicine into a politically divisive issue! We spin and are being spun in ever-decreasing circles.
Black Lives Matter
The original video was removed, the above is the only copy I could find, ignore the woke lettering - it's worth a listen.
I learned so much from the black scholars and hip-hop artists of my youth, the elucidation of their struggle and persecution was instrumental in the formation of my comprehension and understanding. Certainly, we can observe how the war against minorities and the deconstruction of the black ghetto is itself a microcosm of our broader societal collapse.
Divide, conquer, restructure.
As I have previously written, I have come to understand that the gang warfare that is now sadly synonymous with the black ghetto, is a socially engineered construct, the psychology of which utilises the gang dynamic in such a way that it aids the control system. The first stage was when the C.I.A supplied flooded the black communities with crack (in the internet age exchange crack with information) and thus created the conditions that ferment confrontation and social breakdown.
Source
Aside from the contra army it was funding, the social symptoms of this epidemic (and targetted propaganda) devastated the uncontrolled (to the system dangerously unified) inner-city black communities. Cohesion was replaced with gangs/collectives (who in turn wear their division as a badge of honour) and through the drug wars the streets became a battleground. They destroyed both the community, and the organic civil rights movement - now it's expedient to do so, they're attempting to rebuild it as a fake/controlled civil rights/political ideology that preys upon the disenfranchised.
Again, the synthesis requires confrontation to enable its implementation and this is why they're attempting to draw black people into political ideologies and Antifa alignments, to fight a culture war in which there will be no winners. Harvesting and manipulating emotional energies as a means to a Machiavellian end.
To that end, we should also understand that tactical communitarianism utilises the rights of the minority to usurp the rights of a majority populace. This is enabled through an Orwellian inversion/perversion of human rights law. The original purpose of said rights was to protect the individual against the machinations of the state. Conversely, the only institution that can enforce the rights of the minority is the state. Thus, under the guise of equality, through implied threats and ever-broadening hate speech restrictions, the state uses the (collectivised) minority as a means of violating the rights of the majority. To that end, they have been adept at crafting subconscious equations between freedom of expression, and far-right memes. This will evolve toward the persecution and prosecution of anyone who questions the principles of one-worldism.
Ultimately, the state does not care for the rights of the minority and is simply using them as a means of curtailing the rights of everybody. The problem with blindly pointing the finger at your opposition - is that it impedes an ability to reflect on the scale of your self-deception.
Source
BLM Interconnection
It is widely recognised that the construct of the gang is largely enabled by the absence of the father figure. The targetted socially engineered (propaganda/music/drugs etc) breakdown of the ghettos family unit allows the gang to assume the role of the family. Rather than attempt to focus on these issues the BLM community plays to the psychology of the gang. I took the below from their website a couple of years back, but as you can see here they have now slightly altered their wording.
We are committed to disrupting the Western prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, and especially “our” children to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.
The majority of the individuals within these movements have no agenda other than the cause they're fighting for, but within each financed social groundswell, there will be certain (potentially tenuous) commonalities that help drive the plan forward. Below with their own words, we can observe ideological connections between BLM and other corporate-sponsored movements. In terms of the Hegelian dialectic, we can also consider how the term anti-racist, anti-fascist, etc etc, have been (under the guise of activism) weaponised and utilised as a means of projecting racism and fascism towards their antithesis. The anti-ist becoming a reflection of what they purport to resist.
When we gather, we do so with the intention of freeing ourselves from the tight grip of heteronormative thinking. Black lives matter
"The only long-term solution to the fascist menace is to undermine its pillars of strength in society grounded not only in white supremacy but also in ableism, heteronormativity, patriarchy, nationalism. Antifa
The delusions of hetero-sexism/heteronormativity propagate the idea that heterosexuality is ‘normal’ and that other expressions of sexuality are deviant. Extinction rebellion
And below we can observe how these seemingly unconnected events are being utilised as a means of pushing us towards the Agenda 2030 milestone.
She said there were “very, very clear connections” between the Covid-19 and climate crises, and the Black Lives Matter protests around the world, United Nations
Every crisis and each corporate-funded fake grassroots movement is gradually becoming conjoined into a singular antithesis of premeditated change. Unwittingly their followers relegated to compartmentalised aspects of an insidious whole. By juxtaposing these objectives against the fact that all these movements (and hundreds more) have similar narratives/wording and all are directly and indirectly funded by the same globalists that are seeking to drastically reduce the population, to dismantle the nation-state, individual rights, the nuclear family, social foundations, and to re-imagine society as a feudal technocracy, an increasingly nefarious agenda comes into focus.
Source
Follow The Money
Before we continue, much the MK – Ultra connected Macy Foundation I discussed in a previous post, the Ford Foundation (which no longer has anything to do with the Ford family or Ford motor cars) is deeply connected with and potentially another arms-length incarnation of The Rockefeller Family. Indeed, current president of The Ford Foundation is Darren Walker who was previously vice president of the Rockefeller Foundation.
I am not saying that all the individuals within these movements have nefarious intent. I am saying that these organisations have been heavily infiltrated and thus co-opted.
Under the name of the Black-Led Movement Fund (BLMF) and through their partnership Borealis philanthropy, the Ford Foundation has donated $100 million dollars to BLM and a consortium of 14 affiliated groups. It is also worth noting that through their Racial Equity in Philanthropy (REP) Fund, Borealis is supported by W.K. Kellogg Foundation, the Ford Foundation, and the Rockefeller Brothers Philanthropy. The George Soros led Open Society Foundation also has funding connections to Borealis, and has previously funded BLM to the tune of $650,000.
Whilst covering them all is outside the remit of this post, BLM is allied with numerous groups connected to the Freedom Road Socialist Organisation, below I will connect a few to its leadership. One of the three founder members of BLM is Alicia Garza who is the director of an organisation called the National Domestic Workers Alliance. A board member of NDWA is Alta Starr who manages a fund at the Ford Foundation, as well as being on the board of the Open Society Foundations southern initiative. Another director of the NWDA is Ai-Jen Poo who sits as a trustee board member at The Ford Foundation. The NDWA is also a partner and funding recipient of the Hilary Clinton born Onward Together movement and has received Open Society, Ford, and Rockefeller Foundation funding.
The second founder of BLM is Patrice Cullors, who in this video describes herself and Alicia Garza as trained Marxists. Indeed, as we can observe in this interview, Cullor was mentored by former Weather Underground leader Eric Mann. The Democrat Van Jones founded Ella Baker Center For Human Rights has Cullors as its board member, director, and is again funded by The Open Society Foundation & The Ford Foundation.
The third leader of BLM (Opal Tometi) is affiliated with the Black Alliance For Just Immigration, which also has funding connections to The Open Society Foundation. Another patron of The BAJI is Unbound Philanthropy which was founded by former J.P Morgan star trader and founder of Bluecrest Capital Management, William Reeves. Interestingly Unbound is also part funding the aforementioned UK's cabinet office affiliated Behavioural Insights, nudge unit, and has financial connections to NWDA & Rockefeller Philanthropy.
With the Ford And Rockefeller connections alone, Black lives Matter (and affiliated movements) are being directly and indirectly funded by Foundations that have a history of eugenics and population control. Foundations that have been connected to illegal human experimentation in Guatemala, and the forced sterilisation of millions of men in India. Now we're supposed to believe that they're on the side of the minorities? Whilst the leaders of BLM may be happy to ignore these (and a myriad of other) inconvenient truths, I am not!
Source
Choose A Side!
Unified under a dialectical banner of communitarianism both the thesis and the antithesis are marching us towards a socially engineered revolution and a potential civil war. A clash of ideologies that increasingly demands we choose a side. In equal parts, with both their words and their deafening silence, our behemothic mainstream manipulators play to the subjective nature of the mind game. Unfortunately, it's our collective freedom that is in jeopardy. The warring polarities of the left and right will be used as justification for stealing the rights of everybody!
Freedom is neither left-wing nor right-wing - it is universal. Through the manipulation of their political bias, people are being tricked into giving it away.
As our lowest common denominators are filtered through the opposing ideologies of the algorithmically enabled echo chambers of the internet, each side views the very worst attributes of the other. Collectively we are being led towards an increasingly unbalanced, confrontational, and hostile environment. The drums of disorder grow louder, and the middle man is continuously nudged towards a chosen side and a line in the sand. Incrementally people become increasingly polarised, stances are hardened and their foes are dehumanised.
None of this is by accident, human psychology has been probed, measured, and manipulated for literally thousands of years. We are looking at a two-headed system that cultivates division on one hand and hate laws on the other, one that is fanning the flames of resentment whilst limiting free expression. By silencing people’s voices it pushes them towards the echo chambers that will listen, in turn nudging them towards the extremes of their ideology.
The current climate is also about emboldening the communitarian brownshirts to become more overt in their violent interactions. With their broad-stroke idiocracy and mindless mendacity, they dance upon the dialectics of division. Imagine how such conflict could play out against the backdrop of an election, or economic collapse. Once again, the synthesis cultivates and requires confrontation to fulfill its objectives, order out of chaos. Out of the chaos, we find connections to the order of the United Nations.
Source
The Global Communtarian Police Farce
To those on the left that believe Trump has instigated a federal police overreach, where were you when Obama enabled it? Where were you when he signed the National Defense Authorisation Act? Repealing aspects of Posse Comitatus, which had previously limited the power of the federal government to use federal military personnel to enforce domestic policies. Do you see how this works?
In reality, this increasing state of chaos and calls to defund the police has nothing to do with anarchy. Ultimately, whether it's enabled by defunding, legislated change, or some form of confrontation, I believe that the intent is for the growth of a global (UN-mandated) policing community. With the UN strong cities initiative, these wheels are already in motion and are just waiting for the right crisis to fully galvanise them.
Under the guise of tackling extremism (whose definitions are in a constant state of flux) the United Nations strong cities network is the UN-led imposition of globalised (communitarian) policing policies/practices that circumvent and supersede local law enforcement. A UN emanated globally dictated law-enforcement body whose laws govern participating cities.
And connecting those localities to one another – as the Strong Cities Network is doing – is not only a powerful way to lift up our communities worldwide. It also sends a message about who we are and what we aspire to be – as an alliance of nations and as a global community. Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch
The SCN is steered by an International Advisory Board that is run by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) and whose members we can connect back to the Rothchild family, The Rockefeller Foundation, Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, and the Council On Foreign Relations. Members that include House Of Lords, Trilateral Commission member, and non-executive director of N.M Rothchild & Son, Lord Charles Guthrie. The ISD has also partnered with all the big tech corporations (including Google & Microsoft), and Foundations such as aforementioned Open Society, the Brooking Institute, and the Carnegie Corporation.
It should also be noted that (amongst others) many of the big tech corporations that are funding, attempting to censor opposition and debate, whilst crafting the image of BLM (and associated movements) are also corporate members of the SCN connected Council On Foreign Relations. Many of these corporations and big tech companies can also be connected to movements.org whose summits are attended by CFR & DHS members. Movements.org is an alliance of youth movements that were sponsored into existence by (amongst others) Facebook/Google/U.S Dept of state and co-founded by CFR member, Clinton advisor/state department staff member, & Google director Jared Cohen alongside former Google employee/Howcast CEO Jason Liebman.
In respect of current events, it's worth highlighting that (alongside The Open Society & CFR) both big tech and movements.org were an integral component behind the flourishing of the Arab spring. Wasn't it nice that Google created their speak to tweet service to aid activists/protestors in Egypt? Just a shame they're also censoring the web, whilst morphing into a ministry of truth, and helping China build a (now-defunct) censored search engine that erm ... silences activists!
In Egypt, protest leader Mohammed ElBaradei (who was hailed a hero by the CFR) was a member and had served on the board of trustees at the International Crisis Group. The Crisis Group is funded by (amongst others) the Ford Foundation, Carnegie Corporation, Rockefeller Bros Fund, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Open Society Institute. It should also be noted that Soros and his son Alexander also sit on the board of trustees. In the aftermath of the Arab spring, and as highlighted in this article, it was Soros funded organisations that drafted the new Egyptian constitution. Whilst here we can find former Crisis Group member and senior analyst Candace Rondeaux weighing in on BLM & ''the looming American nightmare.''
A social war by the people against the people, that benefits only the power elite.
It should come as no surprise that The Open society Foundation has donated a further $220 million to BLM and black justice groups, some of which are "are fighting for an end to policing as we know it." Current events have also garnered the attention of the Urban Institute, who are funded by and connected to, The World Bank, Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, J.P Morgan Chase (Chase Manhattan was previously helmed by David Rockefeller), Open Society Foundation, and Rockefeller Philanthropic Advisors, to name but a few.
Another keen supporter of BLM is the The Sentencing Project, which again is funded by The Open Society Foundation, David Rockefeller Fund, & Ford Foundation.
As a political atheist, I am no champion of politicians or the police state. Equally, I am not prepared to ignore the obvious, does any of this sound like a grassroots revolution??
The UN will use the erosion of faith and the issues of civil rights to further their aims of defunding local policing and building upon their envisioned globalised police “community”. If the conditions become too volatile, they may request that the UN police take control of the situation. In light of the sexual abuse (of women and children) and murder charges that have been leveled at UN peacekeepers, it is worth noting:
Functional: The vast majority of UN personnel only have immunity for the things they say or do as part of their official duties; this is called “functional immunity.” This means that most personnel of the UN (called “officials” or “experts on mission”), including all the non-military personnel of peacekeeping missions, cannot be taken to court for anything they have said or done as part of their work duties. Source
Slowly but surely most pillars of society (health/medicine/media/science/religion) have been drawn into the one-world system. Those that have resisted are intended to be broken down and rebuilt in the desired image.
Due to the size and scale of this post, there is a final part that will be loaded in the coming days.
Written by @perceptualflaws
Gifs courtesy of giphy.com
Banner Gifs create by @doze
