I am against this proposal, but will not be voting on it either way out of respect for my guildmates in YGG. My reasons are that since the card was printed, many people including myself have made financial decisions based on the current stats and the teams prior reluctance to change problem cards like Yodin and Kitty, which were allowed to dominated for years. Personally, I sold all copies when I decided the card was terrible and I thought I would never play it. I made that choice based on the card as it was designed upon release. I also feel it's a slippery slope to allow SPS whales to decide the fate of cards. Since this proposal, the price of Nid has already gone up, showing that a small number of high SPS holders could easily manipulate pricing by putting forward proposals on any card they would like. This should be a company decision, not a DAO proposal, and should have been tested thoroughly before released. Splinterlands should also take initiative and remove snare from Tofu, which is an identified problem card, instead of leaving everything to a DAO vote. I am torn on this because I want our card to be good, but I don't like the prospect of a small group of people having such control over card design just because they own a large amount of SPS.
RE: Nidhoggr Adjustment Proposal: Addressing Airdrop Balance and Improving Tactics