After winning the first legal issue as to why I had delayed reporting the crime for two and a half years after having brain surgery, I was now having to fight the legal issue of why I delayed the reporting for a further 6 months. If I could not convince the court of my reasons why, then I would not be awarded any compensation. I knew exactly why I didn’t report this rape by an illegal immigrant. It was because of radical Marxism and the threat of arrest. My fear at this point and I was terrified about providing this argument, was that the judges would get angry, offended and retaliate. After all, when the power lies in another’s hands, they do have the power to feel angry and retaliate.
My Legal Argument
The case was made that I had delayed reporting the crime beyond the time limit of 2 and a half years. I had a good argument and case for why I didn’t report the crime for two and a half years with my brain surgery. However, my medical records proved that by 2 and a half years after the surgery I had recollected what had happened and gone to my GP about it to get psychological help. The CICA’s argument was that I should have gone to the police at that time but I didn’t. This is where I set precedent with my own legal argument. I decided to fight Marxism with Marxism.
I argued that due to the way in which the police mishandled the assault which they could have and should have prevented, I believed they failed for reasons of political correctness and the police ‘cultural sensitivity’ training they started to undergo at the beginning of the millennium which I discuss briefly in this article about confrontation in a world of hypersensitivity. At the time of my case, it was also coming to light that there had been a failure in the system with regards to white children, often living in poverty or in care, who had been groomed, gang raped and traded for gang raping within the Muslim community in the UK.
Police had dismissed reports by children as ‘racist’ they had even been reported to have arrested a father of a child whose reports to the police had been ignored so he decided to deal with the perpetrators himself, although I can't find a link. The police had and still are too scared to fight crime if it is deemed they could be sued under human rights for racial discrimination, which they can. That in turn means funding is taken from them and goes towards compensation claims instead. This is a huge problem in every sector and all industries. I support human rights but there is clearly an issue surrounding the manipulation of their definition and rules surrounding them. Rather than holding the original libertarian meaning, with the deliberate mass migration here, it has helped encourage a Marxist interpretion and argument over them.
I of course wrote this theory into my argument, providing evidence of changes to policing after the Stephen Lawrence case you can see here and hope to discuss at a deeper level later. As part of my argument or defence as the case may be, I would end up using vast amounts of mainstream media articles to prove my point. Not only would it help prove my defence but I hoped and I do feel encouraged that this may have opened some eyes.
My defence for not reporting the polite rape would be that due to the radical Marxism being woven into every aspect of life in modern society, Marxism being political correctness, political correctness being the fear of getting sued for discrimination, it meant that police had lost their way. They were no longer here to prevent crime, they were here to protect people feelings and protect their funding from discrimination claims. They had now taken on the role of psychologists and bankers.
With my own experience I was able to show that the police did not help me in preventing a crime they could have stopped. I argued that this was for politically correct reasons and their fear of i) losing their jobs and ii) receiving a discrimination case against them and iii) radicalisation of the police. It was my job here to prove I genuinely believed this and that this genuine belief prevented me from trusting and turning to the police. I was able to prove to the court that this was the case.
To prove it I provided numerous articles from mainstream media. I won’t provide the links to all of them here, however I will provide some links to the ones which still stand out in my memory as proving the radicalisation of our society today. They included:
A 9 year old boy who hung himself after his family moved and put him in a school with predominantly Asian children. He was bullied for being white. When the parents complained to the school, they were attacked for being racist. The nine year old boy hung himself. Here is the article.
An elderly woman driver beeped at a black woman in a garage for taking too long at the pump. The black woman reported it to police as ‘hate speech’ which is a non-crime crime. The elderly woman has that on ‘non-record record’ for the rest of her life. Here is the article.
Media encouraging the public to punch, throw milkshakes, harrass or assault anyone they believe to be a ‘Nazi’. I questioned whether this was hate speech? I did not receive an answer. Article here and turning the perpetrator of the assault into a victim, article here.
An adult ‘refugee’ was placed as a pupil in a school with children. When the parents complained, their concerns were dismissed by teachers as ‘racist’. Here is the article.
A judge held that white children are not affected by rape like Asian children, so Asian children’s rapists should serve longer sentences. This article was removed from search engines. I am not sure if it was archived. I did print a copy for my court case.
A white teenage girl who was placed in a group of Asian girls with broken English was arrested and questioned by police for ‘racism’ after she asked to be moved to an English speaking group. The teacher considered the request to be racist. Here is the article.
A footballer who supported Tommy Robinson in speaking out against Muslim grooming gangs was accused of being a racist and was ordered to apologise. Article here.
The military declared patriotism as being ‘racist’ and they would not accept it in the military (this I understand now, is in preparation for the one world government and one world army the powers that be intend on bringing in). Article linked here.
A European Minister who was also raped by an illegal immigrant. In her case however, she did not report the crime out of fear of fuelling racism. Whereas I am not a Marxist so my fear was being arrested for ‘hate speech’ and ‘racism’. However, I will write more about this case, a compare and contrast article in the future. The article is linked here.
These are just a few of the articles I used to provide my case that I not only didn’t trust the police or legal system but also much of the public sector. The articles along with my aided and polite rape prove the inability we have in society to express ourselves honestly. If we are not allowed to express ourselves honestly, how can we report rapes or other crimes if the victims can be deemed racists?
I will add more articles in future parts of my court case blog and I will also do an investigation piece into when Muslim grooming gangs began. In my research to self-represent my rape, I came across a 2004 article about Muslim grooming gangs, which attempted to blame the BNP. This was a decade before these stories started to pour out to the public on mass. Here is the article.
I still trusted the health care system at that point but cracks were beginning to grow as I saw how it was being weaponised and used as a way of coercion for Marxism. That became obvious to me in 2019, however I expect for some others it may have been recognisable far earlier. I will come back to the health care system at a later date. That changed with the following court case which was to be about how much I would be awarded from the CICA, which I will also detail in further parts.
Using these articles and many more, I was able to convince the court that I had become fearful of political correctness and Marxism entrenched in the public sector. I argued that I did not feel safe turning to police and reporting what I now brand as a politically correct rape, where a 'victim' class gets to rape a 'privileged' class, since the victim-rapist now had the power to accuse the privileged class person (not victim) as a ‘racist’. Therefore in my case the victim-criminal can have the privileged person (not victim) arrested which would cause further trauma and distrust on my part and could even attach a non-criminal report to me forever. In effect, using the Marxists own propaganda and articles on their extremism I was able to build a case against their harmful virtue and able to show the court how utterly flawed and ruthless the ideology really was. And it was the Marxists, their propaganda and their harmful virtue which ensured I won that legal issue.
Some people argue, that it might be the case that the events in these articles never took place and it is all just government propaganda to fuel fear and ensure integration and tolerance within a newly multicultural society. That might be the case and I am open to such an argument, more so in recent Covid times. However, this 'propaganda' can and should be used to our advantage. It can be used to show a political extremism within our society. And I think it is especially easy to use when a person self represents. I'm not sure how easy it would be for a solicitor to dump all these articles on the desk of a judge. So for that reason I whole heartedly encourage people to self-represent.
The court accepted my defence and evidence to be true. I won this legal issue too. I spoke to some solicitors after I won this case and asked them if they would have used political correctness in their own case for such a victim. They all said no. I was astounded. Clearly, or at least to me, political correctness has brought about many challenges, trust issues and radicalisation within our new multicultural society. I can only assume their avoidance of such would be similar to the police i) fear of losing their job, ii) fear of being accused of discrimination and iii) general radicalisation to the point they don’t see it.
It seems and I have been told that it is likely therefore that I set precedent with this argument. And because it was used to successfully prove that I am fearful of political correctness within our system (and assuming others can convince a court that they are fearful too) then it can hopefully be used by others in whatever legal challenge they might be facing.
And that left me with the third legal issue within this, the first part of my claim. The first part of my claim took place 5 years ago. The third legal issue was that I had not been raped but rather consensual sex had taken place. And the next part of my self represented my own rape case blog will cover this argument. Apparently this is a legal issue with every rape case that goes to the CICA. It is one of the arguments which prevents so many victims receiving any compensation award. So I hope the argument I made will be useful for some victims out there.