The meme of Biden sleeping with China's favorite bear, Winnie the Pooh, it is not really sexual in the sense that it is an analogy that uses sex as a way to explain something.
In other words, that cartoon drawing, that photo, it is a metaphor to explain an idiom, that the Deep State Swamp are sleeping with China and other countries. This is an aspect of globalism.
Countries can ban art for any reason, right or wrong, they can say what they want. So, if a country says a meme is too sexual in nature, then they can use that excuse to censor the ideas that the meme is trying to personify.
Whether or not something is too sexual is a good question, a good debate. Anything and everything is sexual in some ways. So, it is not simply a question of if something is sexual, it is a question of how sexual it might be.
My rebuttal would be to find things in Korea that is sexual as evidence that they do sexual things and show sexual things. That is my argument to counter back.
If I were to insult Biden sexually, then the Koreans in Korea could blame me. I would then look at them and say, "And I blame you if any of you guys promote homosexuality, porn, sex outside of marriage, etc, things which sexually destroys families, it causes depression, many people end up committing suicide like they do in Japan for example."
But at the same time, the meme of Biden and the President of China is not really sexual, it looks sexual, but it is not about sex, it is an illustration, a metaphor, an idea, a meme, a concept, it is art, it is an analogy, it is meant to describe something else.
Biden is a puppet of China and that is what the art is describing, therefore it is not a sexual insult because it is not about sex. Biden is not having sex with Pooh. It is not literal. That is the beauty of a meme. It is not literal. It is called art.
RE: 2021-03-14