Yes, questions like this are frequently answered with phrases like "I can do this, I can not do this," but most of these responses are based on assumptions. When we are asked questions, we always try to respond based on our projection of who we believe we are.
For example, most people already have an identity of who they believe they are, but most of the time, we are not entirely who we believe we are, especially if we do not engage in self-reflection.
For example, if someone says I am wicked, I do not immediately dismiss the idea; instead, I try to figure out if it is true and why it might be true, because honestly, I might have done something that is not "bad" because my perspective at the time was skewed or something.
While I can no longer do some of the things I used to do, I can still succumb to temptation and slide down the slippery slope, why? Because life is full of temptations.
For example, a person who has had a good breakfast will not be enticed by the sight of food or tempted to do something crazy to obtain food; however, for someone who is starving, the sight or smell of food sends a signal to the brain that the stomach is hungry.
So what we do in a state of hunger may not be what we think we can do on a regular basis, but once we are motivated to satisfy a need, the need goes all the way to being satisfied because we are no longer in control.
When people lose control, their behavior becomes erratic, and the hymen of personality bias is frequently broken.
Back to the question.
I do not believe that people can predict what they can not do for money based on who they think they are or what values they believe they represent.
We maintain our personality the more stable our life becomes: the more stable your family, income, health or life is, the more you'll be able to sustain the personality you think you have, but the more unstable we become in terms of these things I mentioned, the more we're like to change.
For me, I do not believe there is anything anyone cannot do for money; it takes discipline, godliness, and principle to maintain a resolve even when these positions threaten our survival. People have slept with their bosses at work in order to advance or climb the organizational hierarchy.
When these people first started out, they never imagined they would do such a thing, but as they taste power, affluence, connection, and wealth, the thin line that separates their static personality becomes thinner as these people go on to lose themselves.
The more you break the hymen...
....The harder you'll fall
Infact the more they lose themselves, the more immoral justifications they'll build to back up how far they've gone.
We can become fake friends not because we want to, but because life's circumstances force us to, and we can offend people by not being present in their lives when they need us, which is because we were not stable enough to make ourselves available to them. However, does this negate the fact that we were unavailable for them?
There is nothing impossible for people to do. If it is thinkable, it is doable; I am not talking about alien invasions, but legible thoughts that humans can grasp.
Money rules the world because it provides solutions to more than half of all human problems.
So this accessibility alone implies that the need to obtain it makes people adaptable to what they can and cannot do. When it comes to survival, we usually prioritize ourselves over others, and the only thing that can stop this is perhaps a father's or mother's love for a child, and vice versa.
We need love, loyalty, and dedication that defies logic to overcome this psychological law of gravity. We must be able to understand the benefits and drawbacks while still making selfless decisions that are detrimental to ourselves.
We must sometimes accept that we may lose our lives, jobs, families, homes, or loved ones if we refuse to do what is necessary to salvage the situation. At this point, most people will choose to compromise their faith, belief, or whatever they stand for, particularly if the things I mentioned are at stake.
Our false sense of stability can lead us to believe that we have an unbreakable self-aura, but this is because we have not been tested.
Interested in some more of my posts