Frame control - or 'framing the narrative' are skills you employ and perspectives you take, that go some way to control social interactions and interpersonal relationships.
When you have frame control, people are “playing by your rules”.
They accept your frame - your narrative.
This means they accept your values, your morals, and your presuppositions.
They accept your leadership.
....destroying evil is always doing good
How you frame narrative has momentous consequences for how relationships unfold.
Manipulative and power hungry people will try to frame narratives to persuade others - at almost any cost.
Truth and integrity are only used if it fits 'their' narrative (which is seldom).
Similarly, lies and dis-ingenuity are seen as equally useful tools in the arsenal of the manipulative and power hungry.
Some people use 'frame control' for manipulative purposes (attaining, maintaining, or increasing power) , while others use it to illustrate truths...One is where the narrative itself is the vehicle of information, and not a conscious tool employed to garner influence , but to impart truths.
People who are trying to 'frame control' a narrative for manipulative or control reasons, (a favorite leftist/woke mob/low IQ strategy), use ambiguity, not precision.
They 'infer', not point out directly.
They use broad sweeping statements, not detailed accounts.
They take threads of truth and spin them in way that does not reflect reality (truth) - to then go on to create a false narrative - one which supports or influences others to accept their positions.
These strategies can work quite well on people who are not aware of these mind games - i.e people are unknowingly manipulated to believe a certain thing or other - irrelevant of the truth or facts.
For people who are aware of these techniques - observing ' frame control' for disingenuous reasons comes across as manipulative , weak, and very 'soy boy'... (and can be quite funny to!)
Oh, on a side note - I think sexy miss Karma hates disingenuous people.
Miss Karma
In the ongoing attempted character assassination of my account, the midiwts have piled on as usual - they are pack hunters, and quite cowardly as individuals
(I would draw a comparison to rats, but that would be an incorrect framing - as rats are far from cowardly).
One way of dealing with slurs and incorrect framing is to ignore it entirely , but with the double edged sword of blockchain ...ignoring is not the optimal strategy - and that is not good news for the midwit manipulators, ...bless.
(more about that later - ..and...ouch ! )
The thing with liars framing narratives is that it's meant to be a transitory point in time, and not there forever.
*See the politicians saying one thing at moment, and then the total opposite a few months later.
Disingenuous framing relies on this transitory characteristic.
Not 'standing in truth' as your narrative - i.e. your frame control - only comes back to bite you in the ass.
Standing in truth and using frame control, on the other hand, is timeless - and is a testament to authenticity.
The blockchain is the enemy of the disingenuous.
The midwit psychology, (the nasgul), the manipulator, the weak minded, the weak ego'd, the man child...
Let me change that....In a system of integrity, morals, ethics, and merit being the metrics this would be the case.
When it's not the case, we then have DPoS.
Ergo, in a functioning system based on humanity and it's values, blockchain is the friend of the authentic.
The reason I'm writing this now, before the next part of my operation, is not to defend myself.
This would be a strategic mistake when under attack from the manipulators of narratives.
Nooooooo... The reason that I'm writing this post is to state truths against twisted narratives that are being thrown in my direction.
Not to defend my position, but to state it clearly.
(why , is explained lower down)...
In the coming weeks and months it will act as a point of reference for even more attacks on my character that will undoubtedly be coming my way (silly mid wits - they really do have only have one gear...bless).
So, rather than waste my time going over and over continued spurious attacks - by stating my position categorically , it acts as a reference for anyone who is misled.
One of my supporters sent me this :
This is a prime example of attempting 'frame control'. To paint a picture to fit a narrative.
Lets break it down, shall we?... so as to illustrate perfectly what I've just described above.
'...just so you know' - is a strategy of passive aggression. It's the precursor to a sentence that frames critical appraisals in the clothing of 'helping out'.
It's way to disparage without ever having to take responsibility for it.
It's childish and very low IQ ,if you are aware of the strategy.
By constructing the sentence in this way - Starting with the 'just so you know' first, you are delivered negative inferences in the guise of helping out...
The poison wrapped in candy, kind of thing.
FACT: I referred to paying for sex in the third word countries as a more efficient system to help poor families than any 'charity work'.
No tax , no NGO grifters taking a cut, and no admin costs to dilute the monetary transaction getting to where it is needed most.
Is that clear?
That's a very different picture to the one painted above, isn't it?
See how this works?
The framing of the writer is disingenuous.
It is an attempt to disparage.
It is an attempt to control the readers perception of reality.
(constructing a faux reality for the reader to believe).
It's insulting to the reader, as they are expected to swallow lies and be happy about it....'just so you know'....
Frame control, when using these very low brow techniques , is easily seen through when pointed out ( for those wishing to know the truth).
THE MIDWITS ABILITY TO FOREVER GET IT WRONG IS AMAZING.
'I assume'...he moved to SE Asia for particular reason...'
A not so subtle inference to the first part of the statement, referring to the sex industry in SE Asia and the assumptions of me, therein.
'Assuming' in this case, really does fit the 'make an ass out of you and me' one liner.
FACT:
The reason We 'left the west' - where We were was in the sex industry (escorting , web camming,etc) is the diametric opposite of the inference !
lmao.
You couldn't make this up if you tried.
We left the west and the sex industry, to live a different lifestyle! ...lolol.
(with my then g/f)
The midwits ability to shoot themselves in the foot - continually - is a sight to behold.
I love SE Asia, and living here for over 30 years - on and off - (before and after my foray into the sex industry) , the sex tourism aspect has never played a part in my life.
For example - before my sex industry lifestyle - I'd never even hired a hooker - In SE Asia -or anywhere else- for that matter...
To paint a picture that is false has to involve lots of inferences and 'opinion' - all without any actual information.
Here, the writer not only infers that SE Asia is some kind of sex haven - which is highly insulting of ALL the people of SE Asia , but it displays a condescending attitude of an entire continent - the writer displays humongous cultural ignorance.
The framing of the narrative is to try and disparage - not to provide information - Character assassination is the objective.
Truth and reality are only of any use if it paints the picture the writer wants to paint.
If they do not fit, they're simply twisted or discarded.
The midwit talent for getting everything so very wrong again, continues....lolol.
I was a prostitute*, not a pimp...But don't let facts get in the way of a narrative or anything like that! lol.
*All female clientele , btw - I'm not gay.
This is how this part works....
'Prostitute' could frame me as some kind of a 'victim', but 'pimp' frames me as some kind of evil predator.
Technically speaking I suppose I was both.
I was in charge or marketing for my then escorting g/f.
She did this herself before we got together, but then I landed the job when we were a couple.
I've also helped many girls out in setting up webcamming - for no rewards - not sexual favors, or monetary fee's, or anything else in fact...all recorded on the blockchain (in steemit mostly, I think).
Neither myself, or my (ex) girlfriend , were 'victims' - or predators.
We were highly successful.
We valued our 'employment time' at $200 per hour.
It seemed far better a lifestyle choice (to us) than flipping burgers for $10 an hour.
Time is our only real asset - for all of us - and we valued it as such.
We valued our work time at $200 per hour (or $350 per hour, as a couple).
The attempted dark narrative, and the 'not so subtle' character assassination, doesn't quite look the same now, does it?
You can probably tell by now that my sexuality, sexual attitudes, and sexually derived income offer me no shame, guilt or anything else negative. (no matter how much 'they try to frame it as such).
I only mention my sexual attractions because I have a strong feeling that there are some male accounts on here, that may 'have the hots' for me. ...(expressing itself as anger and disdain - both are forms of attention - it's the classical homosexual repression in denial of their own desires).
While I'm very flattered and all that - it ain't gonna happen.
Suck it up, buttercup (or not, in this case ! lol)
My ex g/f was escorting when I first met her (at a friends party), and she introduced me into the sex industry ! ...
What a result!
(Pre sex industry, I was the consummate highly sexed slut. I slept my way around the world - it was a fantastic experience! Back in the day, the sex industry lifestyle was the epitome of 'the bus mans holiday', for me....back then, I could not imagine a better use of my time for money. I was doing it all for free anyways! lol...).
I am not embarrassed, nor have regrets, nor ashamed - nor do I have any feelings of guilt.
Which makes me a very hard target to attack when trying to 'character assassinate me'.
Why?
Because it relies on guilt, shame, and other negative emotions...
It's something that the self loathing, intellectually insecure midwits, know all about - and as such , project it onto others - 'They' cannot imagine a reality without shame, guilt and self loathing, and so assume all other people must have it as well.
And they hate people who do not share this toxic internal landscape.
Why?...
It's a freedom that they can never taste you see - and they're very envious of it when it's seen in others.
The hardest prsion to escape from, is the one that you've constructed yourself...
Their negativity, toxicity , and intellectual weakness oozes out of them - no matter how 'polite' they try to be while injecting their cancerous poison into unsuspecting minds_.
I'm looking at you, @nathen007 ! lol...
Notice the lack of any actual facts? ..just disparaging remarks.
LET ME GIVE YOU SOME FACTS, SHALL I?
Someone who thinks 2+2 does not have to equal 4 is delusional.
(By the very definition of what delusion is).
Someone who refers to the BBC as a 'good/reliable source of news' is either delusional, gullible, or mentally incapable of cognitive process..
(Anyone that trusts known liars falls into these categories, imo..).
Someone who refers to Keynesian economics, as being 'a system that can work', has no understanding of basic economics and must be of a socialist/communist bent as Keynesian economics is leftism.
...Or is lacking any philosophical rigor pertaining to basic principles of individual sovereignty, which, by extension, implies a lack of sound moral compass.
Someone who thinks that 'attention' is more valuable than the time you are given on this planet.
(How you can give attention to anything , without first having the time to carry out the act - any act in fact - boggles the sane mind).
SO... bearing the above facts in mind - who's delusional here? Who is contradictory?
(the facts are on the blockchain, and are not my opinion).
The above, are the statements of the writer who is trying to frame a disparaging narrative against myself.
Who is trying to frame a narrative to suit their purposes, and who is framing narrative to explain the truth?
The writer in question has been holding a grudge against me ever since my reaming of his weak positions, a couple of years ago.
I was pretty vicious in my dissembling of his perspectives - even by my standards. My bad.
The writer has never accepted my apology for 'going to town' on him ....I did not apologize for any of my arguments - they were , and still are - valid.
He never accepted the apology like an adult, nor has responded to my many attempts to get past it and converse.
I'd like to say its sulking, but I think it's something far darker (my opinion, not facts - hopefully I'm very wrong).
This inability to be able to move on 'like an adult' is indicative of narcissistic injury (due to our discussions).
This is indicative of a malignant narcissistic personality (or worse).
These are my opinions based on my knowledge of psychology - not facts.
I noticed that he's had a stroke (nothing to do with writing this comment a day or so before the stroke, and karma...).
I wish him more than a full recovery - and hope he comes out of it a better man from the horrible experience that he's had to go through.
My wishes seem to have a funny habit of coming true.
The haters here would probably wish me death in the same circumstances...Including taraz, (imo)....bless.
Love is the law, not code. ...Any pennies dropping yet?
Ok, so now that's out of the way....
As I said before, I'm laying it all out here in the open, on one post - so as to avoid going over and over the same old ground time and time again.
I'll leave people to decide for themselves who is being authentic, and who is being disingenuous.
The conclusions that you come to, is you taking responsibility.
If there are any ambiguities I've left out, feel free to ask.
*And not for 'getting your rocks off' purposes you pervs, please - I'm not going into 'the work details' here - there's plenty of those on old steemit posts.
'HE IS DISHONEST, UNTRUSTWORTHY, AND A BLATANT TROLL'.
Dishonest?
Based on what facts?
'Blatant troll' - I'm not even gonna bother with that one - all leftists see the pursuit of truth and logic as 'trolling'- it's the intellectual equivalent of shouting 'racist' to drown out an argument.
Ad hominem attacks - attack the messenger not the message.( i.e they have nothing, only impotence expressed as rage).
HERE'S SOME VERIFIABLE FACTS.
....all you @ 's - please confirm to others on this post, please - when/if you read this - So as to confirm my claims..)
@shepz1 - three years ago, I was in a pickle - and close to my internet being cut off for a few days (agh! lol).
Shepz graciously offered to lend me some steem to cover the bill, which I accepted.
I then returned the steem to him a few days later - and I added 10% or 20% extra steem on the payment, as a 'thank you'.
Hardly the act of someone dishonest.
@angryman @bashadow
Both of these accounts supported me with steem/hive over different periods of time, and gave me tokens to see if I could trade them.
@angryman sent me 100 steem (value of around $16 at the time).
I returned it - all voluntarily, and without ever being asked for it back...
Approximately 180 steem/ hive, and over a 150(?) POB as a thank you. (over $100 in total returned if my calculations are about right).
@bashadow gave me 20 hive in support at the time - without ever asking for it back - it was a gift.
I returned to him 40(?) POB as a thank you for his support. That was also a gift to him, and a token of appreciation.
*the numbers are not accurate, but ball park - I can't be arsed going through the blockchain - the amounts are not important (I'm not a midwit nasgul) , - the money is not important - but the dynamic is.
@battleaxe and @frot
Both of these cool individuals have exchanged POB for hive (and other crypto's direct into my wallet via ltc etc).
This has added upto several hundreds of dollars in value over time.
I have never sent POB to either account, without first taking their hive/crypto deposits.
i.e ...they trusted me to not take the money and run.
I have never reneged on an agreement between us,(please confirm this @frot @battleaxe...) , and in fact - only gave more than favorable exchange rates compared to those on the open market.
I also offered to give @fitnfun a dormant company title that I have here, so as to avoid her having to travel across boarders all the time...for free - the would cost a lot if she was to set it up from scratch. This offer is also on the blockchain.
Unfortunately she is no longer with us to confirm this in person.
Now ask yourself:
ARE THESE THE ACTIONS OF AN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS:
A) DISHONEST ?
B) UNTRUSTWORTHY ?
Choosing what to believe is being told to you, is the responsibility of the reader...
If you fall for - or are taken in by - word salad ignorance, posing as wisdom, or passive aggressive, postmodern 'logic' posing as authentic argument ....THAT'S ON YOU, no one else..
Fucking hell, this a long post!
I think I've cleared everything up - but like I say - It's not in defense of myself ...it's so other readers, off hive , CAN read it it._
(AND THERE'S GONNA BE PLENTY OF EYES ON THIS PLATFORM VERY, VERY SOON ! - YOU CAN TRUST ME ON THIS..)
It's serves as a reference to save time.
I ain't gong it all over again.
It acts as an easy marker.
I might as well write it down now, before phase 2...
This attempted character assassination has only just started, believe me.
My character - using the only objective facts that we can on the blockchain - speaks for itself.
(Unlike the many accounts that I'm going to be pointing out).
And a special thanks to all the whales that have shown their true colors so easily - you are truly the gift that keeps on giving.
....when midwits try to be clever
Coming soon....
THE AZIRCON MARKETING INITIATIVE....
WOULD YOU LIKE TO BE SERF ON SOCIAL MEDIA?
Feudal oligarchs (whales) make rewards 100% conditional...
It's all based on how 'woke' and sycophantic you are, and how willing you are to never ask any questions of the authority.
(Or any intelligent questions at all, really..).
*this does not appear to be the case in the proof of brain tribe.
A big, big shout out to @proofofbrainio once more.
And hopefully this will go some way as to explain why a 'midwit czar' is needed.
I see midwittery as cancerous for any ecosystem, and thus stopping it before it spreads and kills the host, is a vital task.
