I have been speculating a bit lately and not really furthered my opinion on the candidates, but am perhaps more focused on the trivial details of the MGRC committee itself. Someone said "don't obsess over the small things in the MGRC election, its the first one it will be a learning process" ... So naturally I have done that ever since, its very odd as though the individual saying this didn't mean what they had said, hence not having time to focus on trivial details due to their time schedule AFK.
Since is the most radicalized thread ill post this here instead of the megathread.
Has the idea dawned on people we could elect 2 separate committees and 1 would simply be oversight to hinder corruption?
- The MGRC as it is.
- The watchdog(s) for coercion, bribes, and pay to play.
In theory, we would categorize the skills of applicants based on their resumes, and then have a 2nd vote to distribute the labor and skills to specific roles in each of the 2 committees. I personally could have 3 or 4 irl friends of mine apply for the watchdog role specifically and likely win over the community with their resume in relative fields. If a crime is committed or a contract is broken, it would be the watchdogs role to file the claim against the perpetrator. Good Copy skills would be essential.
https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/tm3ks-announcement-for-the-mgrc-election/36572/16?u=phusionphil
September is Going to be Busy
September 1: Candidate submission
September 4: Community video chat
September 7: Helios vote opens
September 18: Helios poll closes