With the advancement of science, we have reached an era where it is possible to change the genetic makeup of a child before birth, and the thought of a parent making their child “perfect” before birth is exciting. Perfect appearance, perfect intelligence, perfect health.
I am an ordinary person, but a science enthusiast. So when I think about this issue, on the one hand I am amazed by the extraordinary achievements of technology, on the other hand I find myself in dilemma about the questions of morality and humanity. First of all, the issue is very tempting. If a parent knows that they can set such genes in their child that will make him talented, handsome, creative and free from the risk of illness—then who wouldn’t want such a child? It is like making the parents’ dream come true. But here is the question—is this “perfection” right for us?
I think that ‘designing’ a child means not only controlling his future, but also narrowing his freedom. We do not know which imperfection in a child will make him a unique person in the future. What we consider a genetic defect may one day become the inspiration for his life.
In addition, it may open up a new dimension of discrimination in society—‘designed babies’ versus ‘natural babies’. Imagine, if perfect babies become a separate class in the future society, then the discrimination in society will be even deeper.
From a moral point of view, can we take responsibility for making a person ‘human’? Do we have this right? Life is a mysterious blessing. Wouldn’t designing it perfectly ruin the beauty of life? I want science to advance, but our humanity should not lag behind it. We should create a place for children to grow, an environment of values, love and compassion. Because these are the qualities that make a person truly ‘perfect’—not the genetic code.