Following the era of course every thing will change. And when it comes to currency, humans as users and creators also participate in changes every era.
Bitcoin can be said to be an example of currency that was created to follow the times. Until the birth of Bitcoin is also said to be the era of the birth of a new currency called crypto currency.
But it is certain and clearly known that when saying crypto currency means not only Bitcoin. Because Bitcoin itself was born to give birth to new types of crypto currency that might be better than Bitcoin itself.
Ascribing superiority to one choice means a mistake, let alone blaming one party to justify the party being promoted.
In this problem we have entered an era where types of cryptocurrencies are developing. If it is said that there is something wrong or one crypto is bad, for me personally, actually none of the crypto currencies that have been created are bad or wrong. Because the mistake is not in the form created, but the mistake is in the intention of the person who created it.
Looking at the outline of the word crypto currency carried is from two words FREEDOM OF FINANCE, meaning that the word freedom means that the global audience has been explained the form of freedom of choice.
So if there is an invitation, or insult to one of the existing projects it means badness in the form of people who promote a project.
The main need is actually maturity, and human consciousness itself. It is not naive if someone wants a big profit, but what must be realized is how to achieve that big profit. Through the right steps or the wrong way.
The context of the conclusion is "Freedom for the advancement of the global community, not one party, individual, tribe, nation, religion, or group". Promote a project according to your language, but never forget that the choice still falls on each individual who chooses.