Until recently, a conviction had been created, one of those where you think, you shouldn't interfere. Why on earth can it turn into a character fight? It is substantial to think about several things, like why the hell is it important to choose sides? I mean, why on earth would you choose a giant monkey or a radioactive lizard? Well, yes. It's a real problem. However, the actual question is which side should you choose?
Now, why Kong vs. Godzilla? If you think about it for a moment it's all a conditioning game about the things you like. It's a simple semantic algorithm. Maybe it's the fact that from the first moment I put Kong vs. Godzilla, I'm unconsciously telling you that I'm referring more to Kong than Godzilla. Because if you remember it is Godzilla vs. Kong the movie. This kind of thing is intentional, you can't change that. But why do I choose Kong over Godzilla they will say?
Kong is a character that is intimately tied to manhood. Because as it happens in many shonen fighting and action movies, you don't relate to the bad guy, rather you relate to the good guy who lives by taking punches and delivering punches. So it all makes sense, the animal is perceived in the idyllic form of the monkey that is Kong, and not only that, we are talking about King Kong. I mean, how can you reject the idea of a giant monkey beating him up knowing the extreme possibility of him losing to a radioactive being? Oh and if that wasn't enough, get an ax to make this journey a nice reason to fight. Hey, folks. Even if he lost, we knew that one way or another Kong would simplify what we are, animals that love to watch the world burn.
So, think about it for a moment, it's not Godzilla who won, it's Kong who is still there as part of our wild way of thinking.
Post made by @shonan, Markdown Layout thanks to @elmisticooscuro,
All images edited in Canva, Grammar corrections in English made in Grammarly.