Hey there, this is Lucky Ali, and welcome to the new blog. Today, we are going to see which way is beneficial from curating manually and delegating for ROI, and this is automated. After buying Hive, the most important thing you can do is power up those Hive tokens, and they will become Hive power. Hive power is the most important asset that provides you with governance. After staking the hive, it can be confusing for the new users that should I curate manually or delegate any project to generate fixed income. So today, in this post, we are going to discuss more about this. For me, both ways have their importance and benefits.
Power up Hive and Self-Curation
You can easily become a curator by just curating content on Hive. Just stake hive and upvote good content, and this way you become a part of the Hive curators community. This way, you can earn curation rewards, but it is not fixed because it depends on how early you vote after the post is published and your total weight value, and the last thing the post's popularity.
Talking about pros and cons, when you curate manually, you have your own control over who you vote for and how much you vote, and the curation reward comes to you. You can also support your favorite content. But let's check cons too, because when you curate manually, you have to invest your time to find good content that can give you a good reward, also curating good content is necessary. And when you vote late, it is not beneficial for you. Also, the reward you are getting here is unpredictable.
Let's say if you go this way of manual curation, then it is expected to receive 5% to 10% ROI. Now it is up to you how you implement.
Delegating to Projects
Delegating to others is a great option because it provides fixed ROI, and it can be a 9% to 15% it depending on the project. There are many curation projects that exist on Hive, such as leo.voter (inelo), OCDB, curangel, India-united, and more. Unlike other projects, Inleo provides Leo tokens as a reward. It depends on the project how much reward you get.
This is like set and forget, also you will receive fixed income. Unlike manual curation, even if you are not active, your curation reward will not be missed. Here you are supporting the different communities by delegating. However, the problem is that you don't have control over who you vote for. The project can use your hive power according to its needs. And some projects can offer less reward than manual curation. You can choose a better project for yourself.
Which one is good for you
I think this does not even matter because you are free to use both ways. Yes, you can use 50% staking for manual curation and 50% staking for delegating different projects. I am the best example of it. I have delegated some projects and am also curating manually. However, I don't own a big chunk of HP, but slowly I am increasing my stake. If you want to choose a path that provides education with earning, then yes, manual curation is the best way, but if you only care about fixed income, then you can go for the delegation. Both things have their own value, and if you are new and still confused, then split your hive power between them. This can be helpful too.
Conclusion
So guys I hope you liked this information regarding which is better delegating hive power or curating manually using hive power and I am damn sure that you got your clear answer. Do you have something to say regarding this information and want to add more value in this post through comments, then go for it. Now it is time to end this post, and I will meet you in my next blog post. Till then, take care and goodbye.
○_________________○___________________○
| 👇 | ||
|---|---|---|
 | Hi I am lucky ali from gujarat, india. I am a crypto enthusiast, blogger, and SEO developer. You can find me on hive, twitter and discord (Lucky Ali#6343). Sharing is caring. Thank you, hive family ♥ |