Sure, but do we need to get bamboozled? The technology is available. I feel that the problem would be in the cost of technology. Is there a way to, let's say, hit the publish button, run the article through scanners, and if the content is greater than a percentage of plagiarism then it gets rejected?
Creators whose content gets rejected can then either challenge the rejection or alter their content to remove or reduce the percentage applied. A separate funded group can evaluate it perhaps and allow it through. I'm just brainstorming at this point. I'm not sure how practical it would be.
I've had two papers in my Master's degree program rejected following submission for such a determination. I referenced direct quotes of questions from my assignment in these papers and that's what the system flagged. The end result is that I had to re-write the questions.
RE: Spent Last 1 Hour Hunting Plagiarism On Leofinance - I found myself a new job