Who's gonna win? @dtube or @threespeak?
After working for several hours, and toiling away under the hot sun (well, I can see the sun, so that counts), and then making the first of, what may possibly be, the funniest documentary ever made in the history of mankind (or maybe not), I uploaded to threespeak.
And then waited, with bated breath, fully expecting that when it did eventually hit the intrwebs, the accolades, the sexual propositions, and the great wealth , would soon be bestowed upon me.
After two or three hours waiting, my breath has been unbated, and my enthusiasm is on ice. (this amazing web 3.0 seems to be a bit of a sticky fucker, sometimes).
And then I remembered Dtube!
So, after digging out my account details, I'm trying to upload it there.
Only time will tell which of these horses is going to cross the finishing line first....
I'm 'bating' again, goddamn it! (I'll wait for @frot to pick the very low hanging fruit just dangling there, with that last sentence -- you can always count on him for that).
While I've been waiting, I came up with another idea..
This was inspired by the commie brain dickwatch commiewhaledick , errr.... kwakwatch.
Apart from the authoritarian, amoeba like intellect shown (have you seen the the list -it's hilarious), he DID gave me an idea...
Lists!
Lists!
...and reviews, even!
On my new website, I'll be doing weekly reviews, in the way that only I seem to be able deliver on this platform.
Except that it won't be on this platform, of course.
I do wish there were at least another dozen accounts doing the same thing as myself, but the fetish for performing fellatio on large aquatic mammals seems to be the preferred activity of the day in these parts...Oh hum.
So.... weekly reviews about the poorest posts,(in relation to rewards), is a good way to make the platform stronger, is it not?
It will be my personal take, and subjective - but I hope that it will help members steer clear of idiocy feigning as intelligence, or trudging through narcolepsy inducing paragraphs, that end up with you having some serious suicidal thoughts.
It's all just my opinion of course, and only the uber snowflake, or the weak ego'd individual, would take offence. (they would also have to be a member to have access to the reviews, probably satisfying any cuckold, or masochistic desires,they may have).
If anyone remembers Barry Norman, back in the day (on the BBC), he used to give film reviews.
I honestly can't remember if they were good reviews or not - BUT the point still stands.
Good reviews matter.
Not even good reviews, but reviews that can be trusted. ...And thus, help you cut through the idiocy that online, quickly (rather than wasting precious minutes of your life, trying to unpick a world salad that has less substance than half a dozen hydrogen atoms).
You feel cheated,and rightly so - but by then it's too late!!!
That time - your time - has been hijacked, nay stolen , off you, under the false pretense of 'having something to say'.
This is, in my opinion, a hanging offence.
( I think it deserves three hangings - at the very least).
So, if you knew of some individual that you believed to be critical, but honest, and possess some modicum of integrity, it can serve as a good way for the discerning reader to save themselves time.
And that's all I have to say on the subject.
As usual, your input and suggestions are welcomed.
What is most definitely not welcomed - is that fucking wheel that's still spinning, (and a blank screen on dtube, asking me to 'wait patiently').
Question of the day :
Why does it feel like 56k dial-up is quicker, and less clunky, than the new 'web 3.0', sometimes?
